NEWTON SCHOOL
COMMITTEE
MINUTES OF REGULAR
MEETING, MAY 23,2005
EDUCATION CENTER,
FRAZIER ROOM, 7:30 P.M.
PRESENT: Vice-Chairperson Dori Zaleznik, Gail Glick,
Susan Heyman, Patricia Kellogg, Marc Laredo, Nancy Levine, Reenie Murphy
ABSENT:
Chairperson Anne Larner, Superintendent Jeffrey Young, Mayor Da\ Cohen, student
representatives
OPEN SESSION
MOTION: At 6:20
p.m., it was moved, by roll call vote, to convene in executive session for the
purpose of hearing a grievance. If passed, the Committee will reconvene in open
session at 7:30 p.m.
(Murphy - Levine) 8-0-2
Absent for vote: Zaleznik
Absent for meeting: Mayor
Cohen
ROLL CALL VOTE BY WARD:
Ward I, "yes" (Glick); Ward II,
"yes" (Murphy); Ward III, "yes" (Larner); Ward IV,
"yes" (Levine); Ward V, "yes"
(Heyman); Ward VI, "yes" (Kellogg); Ward VII, "yes"
(Laredo); Ward VIII, absent for vote (Zaleznik); Mayor Cohen, absent for
meeting
CALL TO ORDER
Vice-Chairperson Dori Zaleznik called the meeting to
order at 7:35 p.m. She
noted that the Chairperson and Superintendent are at
the Board of Aldermen this evening.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Bette Lupo, President of the Newton Secretaries
Association (NESA), asked the Committee to reconsider the cuts to their
organization. Tonight she will talk
mostly about the impact on the secretaries in the
schools and will return at the
next meeting to address those in the Education
Center. After last year's budget
cuts, their members have taken on more tasks and
increased responsibilities and have yet to even assess the impact from those
decisions. Now they face the loss of an additional 4.5 full-time equivalencies
(FTEs), which will only have an
adverse impact on the services they provide. Despite
what some may think, secretaries provide direct services to students in
addition to all of their
Minutes - 5/23/05
page 2
administrative tasks. On a daily basis they are asked
to pass messages along from parents, provide lunch money when students forget
theirs, make arrangements for pickups and drop-offs, and often just lend an
area to a student with a problem. Secretaries not only provide clerical
services, but chaperon dances and field trips. It is these personal touches
that make the difference in a student's day. At the high schools, they are in
charge of the college application process, in which students are now applying
to many more schools than they had in the past. As the system becomes less
centralize,d, they take on more tasks that were once conducted at the Education
Center. State mandates require much more reporting from the school level.
Lucia Dolan, Mason-Rice Elementary School parent,
addressed the Committee with regard to the math curriculum. Three years ago her
daughter's third grade class was still doing single digit addition and she
became concerned that the curriculum was not sufficiently rigorous, so she
began doing research. Many well-renowned mathematicians do not think highly of
the Everyday Math
program, which is used in Newton, and over 200 of
them wrote an open letter to the Department of Education (DOE) asking that the
National Science Foundation withdraw their endorsement of this program. They
cited neglected algorithms which need to be practiced to be prepared for math
at the college level. Newton has a gap in math scores based on economic status.
Students eligible for the free and reduced lunch program perform well below
others. She believes this gap is a result of more well off families
supplementing their children's learning with private tutoring and extra homework
assistance. They need to strengthen their math curriculum with a reemphasis on
basic skills.
Stephanie Fidel and Sue Rosenbaum, Cochairpersons of
next year's Newton South High School Council, addressed the Committee as a
follow-up to their presentation at the last meeting regarding class size. In
one year the five large academic departments have seen the percentage of
classes with 25 students or greater double. They know the Committee and
administration are committed to stemming this trend. However, the latest
projections for next year indicate that 44% of these departments will have
classes with more than 25 students and this is with the current restoration
provided by the Committee. The numbers are even more staggering in the honors
and advanced placement courses, of which nearly 80% will have more than 25.
They then provided some data on specific courses and noted that even a small
portion of an FTE can go a long way toward addressing these problems. Students
are getting less individual attention. The stress is greater on both students
and staff. There is little opportunity for good
dialogue and for teachers and students
to really get to know one another. They have been experiencing increased
enrollment for several consecutive years and this year had 40 more students
than projected. This puts tremendous strain on their building. They hope
consideration will be given to additional staffing allocations at the high
schools.
Minutes - 5/23/05
page 3
STUDENT REPRESENTATIVES' DISCUSSION
None.
RECOGNITIONS
The following students, from the Bigelow Middle
School Drama Team, under the
direction of Michael Fitzgerald, were recognized for
winning best ensemble and a silver medal for overall performance at the
Massachusetts High School Drama Festival in Lynnfield:
Angelina Zhou, Jesse Kaplan, Lucas Simonis, Sarah
Garcia, Kimberly Arsenault, Jordan Ascher, Derek Butterton, Jennifer Diamond,
Olivia Donnini, Skylar Fox, Samantha Gluck, Annie Gombosi, Rebecca Greenstein,
Kirsten Holland, Alice Howe, Emily Hutchinson, Casey Knotts, Emma Mayville,
Gabe Nicholas,
Annabel Raby, Eva Saltus, Tili Sokolov, Ariel Yoffie,
Paul Batchelor, Brendan Hathaway, Will Batchelor, Genya Shapinko, Anthony
Tucci, Prateek Allapur, Elliot Raff, Charlotte Robinson, Janling Quek, Ashley
Young
APPROVAL
OF SCHOOL COMMITTEE MEETING
MINUTES
MOTION: It
was moved to approve the School Committee meeting minutes of 3/14/05.
(Glick - Murphy) 7-2
Absent: Larner, Mayor Cohen
REPORTS
CURRICULUM UPDATE - MATHEMATICS
Carolyn Wyatt, Assistant Superintendent for
Curriculum & Instruction, introduced
members of the panel who will be speaking and
answering any questions from Committee members.
Mary Eich, K-8 Coordinator of Mathematics, stated
that the report includes a lot of emphasis on the middle schools, as it has
been an area of concern for a number of years and it is where children start
entering different levels of instruction. They have been carefully reviewing
the transition at all levels to address consistency of program. The report
includes some recommendations in draft form.
Minutes - 5/23/05
page 4
Steven Rattendi, Mathematics Department Head at Newton South, talked about how he and his counterpart at Newton North have made a concerted effort to open up the lines of communication and have realized that there is more consistency between the high schools than they had expected. Now they are reviewing the curriculum to see what is being offered at each grade in both schools and feeding that i~to what occurs at the lower levels.
Cindy Bergan, Mathematics Department Head at Newton
North, commented that the review has also helped them see that the
communication piece between school and home is key. They need to better
articulate how they conduct placement and the transition from middle to high
school. The additional instructional time they are afforded for the
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) preparation has been very
effective and each year they learn how to better utilize that time. They have
also been working collaboratively with special education (SPED) staff in
co-teaching a number of curriculum 2 classes, which has been very successful.
Susie Heyman asked about the comments made by a
previous speaker around the Everyday Math program.
Mary Eich replied that they have been using this
program for at least eight years and Newton was one of the first communities to
adopt it on the East Coast. It
was a well-researched and piloted program and is now
in its second edition. It is a K-6 program but up until now they only used it
through grade 4. The program has a number of strong qualities. One of its
problems is that it does not look like what adults learned in school and texts
are not provided until third grade, so
some parents do not find it easy to understand how
the worksheets that children bring home fit into the larger picture. They have
been addressing this by hosting meetings with parents in the classroom to
explain and even have them
participate in the work so that they have a better
understanding. The program
has a lot of surface mathematics and then when one
digs deeper there is another more complex layer of mathematic concepts, but in
forms that are accessible to elementary children. They are also working with
teachers to better understand what they are building on from a previous grade
and what they are passing along to the next grade.
Marc Laredo asked why they had stopped using this
program at grade 4.
Mary Eich stated that this decision was made prior to
her coming to Newton. The program that was chosen for the middle schools was
Connected Mathematics
and some of the units were used in grade 5. While it
has worked well for some students, it is missing substantial pieces of the
fifth grade curriculum because it was not written for that level. Teachers have
done a good job of filling in the missing material but it has not been
successful from a systemwide standpoint.
Minutes - 5/23/05
page 5
Therefore, they are recommending moving the program
into the fifth grade and then having a consistent middle school program.
Marc Laredo asked what other type of programs they
reviewed.
Mary Eich stated that they researched a lot of
programs, but the three contenders were Singapore Math, Turk Investigation
Series, and a text that looked more like the traditional math most adults
remember. None of them seemed superior or offered anything better than the
Every Day Math program and would also require purchasing a great deal of
supplementary materials.
Gail Glick asked if they could talk about the
transition into high school and how they will assure that students will not be repeating
things learned in the accelerated math courses at the middle schools.
Mary Eich explained that throughout elementary
school, mathematics has a multi-strand feature, which involves number
operations, algebraic concepts, geometry measurements, etc. Once students get
to the seventh grade, mathematics becomes more of a one-strand focus into
pre-algebra and algebra and then at the high school level it becomes
multi-strand again. In reviewing the middle school program, they are looking
for something that will be less one- stranded, so as to ease the transition.
Cindy Bergan added that the high school math teachers
have been meeting with the seventh and eighth grade teachers citywide to talk
about the topics that are being covered and issues around the transition. At
North they offer an upper curriculum and honors option and will be improving
those programs so that students are not doing repetitious work. At the same
time, a lot of students in curriculum 1 require some repetition of algebra, as
it forms the foundation for trigonometry and calculus in the higher grades.
Steve Rattendi stated that they have done it somewhat
differently at South, where they were finding a great deal of repetition of
materials. Their curriculum is designed so that students in 8th grade
accelerated math can skip into 10th grade curriculum 1 and they have added a
few geometry units into the eighth grade to make that work.
Reenie Murphy asked about the parental override at
the middle school level in terms of student placement in math and the issue of
tutoring.
Mary Eich responded that the difficulty with the
parental override is that it is not easy to predict how much a child will
mature each year. While they do not want to shut doors any sooner than they
have to, accelerated courses are not the best
Minutes - 5/23/05
page 6
option for everyone. The teachers do an excellent job
in making their recommendations and the majority turns out to be accurate.
Ideally she would like to see the teachers' recommendations stand but the
principals are reluctant to do that and she is reluctant to recommend it for a
variety of reasons. In terms of outside tutoring, this adds a level of
difficulty because it becomes an issue of equity. While they try to counteract
that with additional help from teachers, it does not meet the same level of
support. They do not have much control over
this, so what they hope to do is make it easier
for students to move between levels at the high school, so that the decision
with regard to tracking in the middle schools does not necessarily determine a
permanent placement.
Cindy Bergan commented that mobility between
levels is important, but given the somewhat sequential nature of the material,
it can be problematic. They have developed some summer programs that help
students move up a level as they mature and feel more capable of handling the
load.
Marc Laredo asked if they have any information on
the success of students whose parents requested an override of the math
placement, as well as how many families use supplemental tutoring.
Mary Eich stated that the override data is
handled differently at each school. Some feel strongly that teachers should not
be made aware of which students in their class are there as a result of a parental
override, thereby eliminating the possibility of a predisposition on children's
abilities. Anecdotal data indicates that students placed in a higher class than
what was recommended by a teacher often struggle. This does not mean that they
do not work hard or become successful, but the transition is very difficult. I
n terms of the information on tutoring, they did conduct some surveys and she
can provide the Committee with that data.
Marc Laredo suggested collecting the data without
identifying the students.
Cindy Bergan stated that she offers parents an
opportunity to review the course work and tests, as another tool to help them
in their decision making.
Mary Eich noted that North offers an entrance
exam for math which has worked well. While she hesitates to add to the already
large amount of testing that occurs, it might make people more comfortable if
they had a systemwide tool that could help in making these types of decisions.
Dori Zaleznik commented on some of the MCAS data,
which indicates that there
Minutes - 5/23/05
page 7
are more students of color in the lower level
classes, which do not get as much algebraic concepts.
Mary Eich stated that moving to a multi-strand
curriculum in grades 7 and 8 should help this issue. However, the 8th grade
MCAS exam is not an algebra 1 test and some teachers have indicated a
preference for spending more time on some of the other strands and less focus
on algebra. Teachers are doing what they feel is best for their students and
she has not dictated a particular text until she feels comfortable with what is
being chosen.
Marc Laredo asked when they anticipate having a
standardized text in the middle schools.
Mary Eich replied that they plan to introduce a
single text in 1h grade in the fall. The idea is to begin the new curriculum in
grades 5 and 7 next year and grades 6 and 8 the following year.
Patty Kellogg asked how students in the SIMMS Program
did on the MCAS exam.
Steve Rattendi noted that they only have one year's
worth of data and that indicated that the results were right in the middle,
which is where they expected given that this program draws on students from the
lower and upper curriculum 1 classes.
Susie Heyman asked if they are planning to add a math
lab at Newton South.
Steve Rattendi responded that they have applied for
grant funding through.the Newton Schools Foundation for this purpose and he
hopes to have this in place next year. He anticipates drawing from the student
population and utilizing them as tutors for credit.
Susie Heyman asked how reducing the number of levels
in 1h and 8th grade will help the program.
Mary Eich stated that it goes toward the notion of
not closing doors on students at too young an age. Both Bigelow and Oak Hill
utilize this model and it has
been pretty successful. While it eliminates the third
level and requires a lot of additional support for students who were in that
level, they have been able to provide that with the additional time and use of
the SPED teachers, which was mentioned earlier.
Dori Zaleznik asked if there is any way to determine
if the achievement gap is
Minutes - 5/23/05
page 8
related to reading ability vs. understanding number
concepts. She also
wondered if there is any thought to modeling
mathematics teaching along the lines of the literacy program, to focus
promoting literacy as a way of advancing mathematical learning abilities.
Mary Eich noted that there is a correlation between
students' scores in math and reading. Most of the questions involve words and
interpretation of language.
The traditional word problem is gone and now it is
all questions asked in words. They have been very explicit about teaching
reading in content areas in the elementary and middle schools. Elementary
teachers are better prepared for this because they have more training across
disciplines. Added to that is the fact that math has its own special vocabulary
and even ordinary words, such as table, have different meanings, so, there is a
great deal that has to be explicitly taught. In terms of the question regarding
the achievement gap, obtaining that type of data would be better accomplished
through teachers compiling information vs. getting it from the context of the
MCAS.
Marc Laredo asked if they anticipate additional costs
to implement their recommendations.
Mary Eich replied that the textbook cost is already
factored into next year's budget and they will have to do the same the
following year for grades 6 and 8. There will be a need for a lot of
professional development as they continue to make further recommendations, but
have not yet determined how that mechanism will play out.
Gail Glick asked about the recommendation for
employing math curriculum specialists.
Mary Eich stated that math curriculum specialists
like the literacy specialists, can identify and mediate early on for children
who are having difficulty in the subject matter. They have put in place a K-3
assessment tool to begin this process.
One of the differences between English language arts
and math is the level of available research. There has been a tremendous amount
of work in language acquisition, reading skills, etc. but very limited amounts
in the field of mathematics.
Carolyn Wyatt mentioned that their work with the
Education Collaborative
(EDCO) has allowed them to connect with other
districts that are exploring the notion of how to provide early intervention in
mathematics, in the hopes of identifying effective research, as well as drawing
from within their own structures of successful models. They do not anticipate
having additional dedicated staffing for this purpose, but rather utilizing
current staffing differently. They have been working with principals around
identifying how they can capitalize on site-based
Minutes - 5/23/05
page 9
people who might assist in tutorials and coaching.
They are only in the preliminary stages at this point.
Patty Kellogg asked if they could offer a full year
of regular calculus rather than a half year of calculus in curriculum 1, as it
can become a very important component of a student's career choice.
Steve Rattendi replied that a full year of calculus
would limit other options they can offer students. They could do this in
curriculum 1 but they would be covering the material in such a fast pace that
not all of the students would be able to keep up. South does not offer even the
half year option, which was a decision made before his time. If they do
decide to offer the half year course, he wants to be clear about what would be
eliminated and then how that compares to North's curriculum. There are some
senior half-year electives, which may be one way to add it to the curriculum.
Part of his concern is introducing calculus to students who are not necessarily
ready for it and creating an even bigger problem when they get to college and have to take a
remediation course. At the college level there are some good debates going on
among professors that want no calculus taught in high schools and those who
want more.
Carolyn Wyatt ended the discussion by noting that
there is no perfect math curriculum and there will always be debates among
mathematicians and scientists about the quality of a program. Their job is to
look at the scope and sequence of skills and concepts and work with teachers to
present these skills and concepts in a systematic and consistent approach. They
must constantly be thinking about the effectiveness -of the materials to meet
the goals that have been set. They believe the recommendations coming from this
math review will
cement this into a very solid program. Newton
students continue to perform exceedingly well in this area and now they must
work to bring all children to that level.
Dori Zaleznik requested that in the future they
attempt to reflect the data on the same cohort of students so that they can see
their progression. Looking at the data each year skews the evaluation in some
respects because they are looking at different groups of students.
Carolyn Wyatt agreed. This is the first year that
they will have a full set of longitudinal data.
UNEMPLOYMENT UPDATE
Dori Zaleznik noted that the Committee had asked
the administration to come back to this item in May, to see if there might be
additional funds that could be
Minutes - 5/23/05
page 10
recovered in this account once they had more information.
Sandra Guryan, Assistant Superintendent for
Business, Finance & Planning, stated that their information is now more
specific in terms of retirements and resignations. They have determined that
there will be very few to no layoffs of existing personnel in the teaching
area. However, they did leave in a few as a precautionary measure in case there
was a particular subject area that could not be covered by one person moving to
another job.
Marc Laredo is comfortable with this analysis and
understands the need to be conservative at the start. The additional data
paints a clearer picture.
Dori Zaleznik asked how unemployment calculations
are made.
Sandy Guryan stated that the payments are related
to the amount a person earns, but there are caps. This has been figured into
their calculations.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
None.
ACTION ITEMS
CONTINUED DISCUSSION/VOTE ON SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT
PLANS:
--~ ~ ~ - ---
MIDDLE SCHOOLS
MOTION: It
was moved to approve the Middle School
Improvement Plans and Amendments to the High
School Improvement Plans, as outlined in the 5/5/05 materials.
(Heyman - Levine)
7-0-2
Absent: Larner, Mayor
Cohen
COMMUNICATIONS
None.
Minutes - 5/23/05
page 11
PUBLIC COMMENT
Deena David, Waban, thanked them for the
opportunity to hear about the math
curriculum review. One observation she has made
watching her children go through the schools is that students sometimes lose
confidence in their math abilities when they enter the next level. When
teachers are nurturing and relate well to the age group, students feel more
comfortable taking risks, raising their hands, and asking questions. In
choosing math teachers for the middle and high schools, it is important to
select these type of people because they can make all the difference.
Paul Friedberg, West Newton, had a few
suggestions as they finalize their math curriculum. First, he believes it would
be more helpful to parents to see the textbook ahead of time so that they have
a better understanding of the program, as opposed to just getting sheets of
paper that do not show the holistic view.
This can help parents make better decisions about
how to assist and supplement the needs of their children. The supplemental work
or tutoring that parents provide to their children will be important
information to obtain, as it will correlate to the work they need to do in the
curriculum revision. He also suggested that more succinct report be sent to
parents that would just highlight the main topics. The linkage between math and
literacy is important and he suggested other types of correlations, such as taking
real-world problems and translating them into mathematic formulas. At what
grade students use calculators is something
that should also be added to the area of
systemwide consistency. With regard to the achievement gap, they should look at
some systemwide community effort in this area, whether it be tutoring or some
other type of program, to provide these students extra assistance. And in
looking at the other end of the spectrum, if there is a higher percentage of
students in a particular cohort doing well, perhaps they could learn from that
and apply similar strategies to those in the lower categories. They should also
be taking programs that are successful in one school and applying them to all
schools. Finally, he supports the recommendation to increase the number of SPED
teachers competent in math, but understands the budget situation they face. He
suggested considering using student teachers from local colleges.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 9:10p.m.
~
Minutes - 5/23/05 page 8
data would be better accomplished through
teachers compiling information vs. getting it from the context of the MCAS.
Marc Laredo asked if they anticipate additional
costs to implement their recommendations.
Mary Eich replied that the textbook cost is
already factored into next year's budget and they will have to do the same the
following year for grades 6 and 8. There will be a need for a lot of
professional development as they continue to make further recommendations, but
have not yet determined how that mechanism will play out.
Gail Glick asked about the recommendation for
employing math curriculum specialists.
Mary Eich stated that math curriculum specialists
like the literacy specialists, can identify and mediate early on for children
who are having difficulty in the subject matter. They have put in place a K-3
assessment tool to begin this process.
One of the differences between English language
arts and math is the level of available research. There has been a tremendous
amount of work in language acquisition, reading skills, etc. but very limited
amounts in the field of mathematics.
Carolyn Wyatt mentioned that their work with the
Education Collaborative
(EDCO) has allowed them to connect with other
districts that are exploring the notion of how to provide early intervention in
mathematics, in the hopes of identifying effective research, as well as drawing
from within their own structures of successful models. They do not anticipate
having additional dedicated staffing for this purpose, but rather utilizing
current staffing differently. They have been working with principals around
identifying how they can capitalize on site-based people who might assist in
tutorials and coaching. They are only in the preliminary stages at this point.
Patty Kellogg asked if they could offer a full
year of regular calculus rather than a half year of calculus in curriculum 1,
as it can become a very important component of a student's career choice.
Steve Rattendi replied that a full year of
calculus would limit other options they can offer students. They could do this
in curriculum 1 but they would be covering the material in such a fast pace
that not all of the students would be able to keep up. South does not offer
even the half year option, which was a decision made before his time. If they
do decide to offer the half year course, he wants to be clear about what would
be eliminated and then how that compares to North's curriculum. There are some
senior half-year electives, which may be one way to add it to the curriculum.
Part of his concern is introducing calculus to students who are not necessarily
ready for it and creating an even bigger problem when