MINUTES OF
REGULAR & BUDGET MEETING,
PRESENT: Chairperson
Anne Larner, Vice-Chairperson Dori Zaleznik,
Gail Glick, Susan Heyman, Patricia Kellogg, Marc
Laredo,
Nancy
Levine, Reenie Murphy, Mayor David Cohen,
Superintendent
Jeffrey Young, Charlie Heidlage – student
representative –
ABSENT: student
representative –
CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Anne Larner called the meeting to order at
PUBLIC COMMENT
Susan Warschauer, Waban,
read a poem that she wrote entitled “School Budget,” that addressed the cuts
they are facing.
Beth Gallaway, librarian
in the Metrowest Massachusetts Regional Library System, talked about the
services
George Abbot White,
advisor of the
Ken Waldman, 5th
grade teacher at
Brad Hammer, 3rd
grade teacher at Ward, is very disappointed in the potential cuts of teachers,
aides and librarians – all positions which directly serve students. Given the emphasis on the literacy initiative
and the fact that the system paid approximately $15,000 per school to automate
the libraries, this decision seems counterintuitive. The librarian is also the media specialist
and oversees the 24 computers, 15 I-books and 13 I-Macs in their school and
assists staff in learning to utilize the technology for the classroom. Without this person, there would have been no
progress reports this year.
Kathleen Jacobson, 4th
grade teacher at Ward, stated that as a first year teacher, she has spent a lot
of time familiarizing herself with the grade level benchmarks. Without the support of the librarian, her
goal to meet and exceed these benchmarks in her classroom would have been
severely hampered. It is her expertise
in the area of research and technology that is invaluable to staff and teachers
cannot learn to integrate technology into the classroom without the librarian’s
support. She mentioned several specific
outcomes that could not have been reached without the support of the librarian.
Barbara Fahey, special
education teacher at Ward, talked about how instrumental the librarian was to
her, as she came from a PC environment to Macintosh. In addition to the support she offers
teachers, she also teaches children directly and listed several of these
curriculum initiatives. The library is
the heart and soul of a school and the librarian knows each child’s interests.
Ben Miller,
Peggy Rothschild,
kindergarten teacher at
Gerry Zipser,
Jane Thompson, retired
Susan Raskin Abrams,
Supervisor of Children’s Services at the Newton Free Library, talked about how
over the year she has seen that children are better trained in the use of
library services as a result of full-time librarians in the public
schools. She rarely sees many of the
students except for in the summer because the school librarians are doing such
a wonderful job.
STUDENT REPRESENTATIVES’ DISCUSSION
Charlie Heidlage
expressed concern about the cuts to the art, music and business department
heads at Newton North, which will have a domino effect. If these people lose their voice in
department meetings, it will become easier to take cuts from these areas in the
future.
RECOGNITIONS
The following
recognitions were acknowledged:
Lisa Mikus, 4th grade teacher at
who
participated in the Association of Teachers of Mathematics in
The
following National Merit Scholarship Finalists:
Daniel
Asher Max
Adelman
Bethania
Bacigalupe Chiraag
Mundhe
Jonathan
Bao Katherine
Pape
Jessica
Becker Sonia
Step
Julie
Caplow Stephen
Trask
Matthew
Dinger David
Wittenberg
Thomas
Foote
Zoe
Paschkis
Semyon
Tikh
Matthew
Westman
Ane
Xu
The
following students who were selected to participate in the
All
Eastern Music Festival in
2005
Music Educator National Conference – Eastern Convention:
Jake
Aaron Samantha
Escher
Ernest
Moy
Samantha
McDonald
Anna
Schapiro
APPROVAL OF SCHOOL COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES
MOTION: It
was moved to approve the minutes from the
School Committee caucus,
meeting,
and
(Heyman
– Zaleznik)
unanimous
REPORTS
SUPERINTENDENT’S PERSONNEL REPORT
There were no questions
on the report.
OPERATIONS STATUS REPORT
Michael Cronin, Chief of
Operations, provided a brief update on the Operations Report. There were increased work orders this past
month in the HVAC area, as indicated by tonight’s materials. As warmer weather comes, they will be able to
get back to some of the smaller items that have been put on hold during the
winter. The environmental team conducted
some additional training sessions this month to get more buildings on
line. Food Services offered a couple of
new programs, such as introducing a veggie burger and a Sponge Bob Square Pants
theme day at the elementary level, which seemed to appeal to the students. Some of the Food Services managers also
attended a certification program offered by the Department of Education.
Reenie Murphy commented
that with the bulk of the work going toward heating issues, she wondered how
they are able to address the other items given the limited funding.
Mike Cronin stated that
they do eventually get to some of the other items in the queue, but they have
to wait until the winter season is over and even then they will not be able to
address all of the requests.
FY05 BUDGET UPDATE
Sandra Guryan, Assistant
Superintendent for Business, Finance & Planning, explained that tonight’s
report covers a two month period, since last month’s School Committee meeting
was cancelled due to weather conditions.
The current financial picture is tighter than what has been reported
previously because of the increase in the number and cost of special education
tuition placements. This area is
approximately $200,000 over budget. At
the same time, they have realized approximately $50,000 savings in other
accounts and so are projecting a year-end shortfall of $155,000. They feel that they can manage this shortfall
and she will provide more details in the next report.
SPECIAL EDUCATION UPDATE
There were no questions
on the report.
REPORT ON PRIVATE SCHOOL ENROLLMENT
Sandy Guryan reported
that the percentage of students from
Reenie Murphy asked if
these numbers include students placed in day and/or residential programs.
Sandy Guryan replied in
the affirmative.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
FY06 BUDGET DISCUSSION: REGULAR INSTRUCTION
Elementary Schools
Judith Malone Neville,
Assistant Superintendent of Schools, stated that this has been a difficult
period, as they review the budget to determine what pieces are essential and
where cuts can be made that will have the least impact on the classroom. At the elementary level, there will be some
larger classes as a result of fewer classroom teachers. The specifics have yet to be determined
despite the rumors circulating in the community.
Jeff Young reiterated
Judy’s last comment with regard to the allocations. The allocation list from the class size
report, which many people are citing, is only a model. His directive to staff was to produce an
array of classrooms where none would exceed 25, in order to see what they would
require to meet this goal. This year
they run 244 classes in grades K-5 and would need an increase of five more
classes to meet the goal. The recommended
budget calls for 235 classes and they are still in the process of generating
models of how to best distribute this number.
Judy Malone Neville
added that they are currently working on kindergarten registrations and will
have a clearer picture over the next several weeks. In addition to increased class sizes, there
will also be a reduction in program at this level, including librarians, which
will mean that libraries will not be staffed at the current rate and the
literacy and technology support will be reduced.
David Castelline,
Principal of Underwood Elementary School, provided an overview of what the
librarian cut will look like in his school.
Currently the librarian is staffed at 1.0 full-time equivalency
(FTE). Under the proposed budget, the
librarian will only be able to cover classroom instruction lessons. There will not be sufficient time for
individual attention, where a librarian matches books to students’ interests
and reading level. There will also be
less support for teaching research skills and less time that the library will
be open for students to hone these skills.
The assistance for staff in technology-related projects for their
classroom will be curtailed or lost.
Librarians will not have the time for the overall management of keeping
the library collections up to date to support the State Frameworks and
Eva Thompson, Principal
of Peirce Elementary School, talked about the impact of the librarian cuts on
the professional development of teachers.
The librarian/media specialist provides tremendous support for teachers
to develop and sustain their skills in the area of technology. With reduced time, they envision teachers
using less of these tools in the classroom and less curriculum
integration. The school web sites are a
perfect example of the knowledge and skills that librarians have been able to
provide teachers and she believes these will be impacted without that
support. The librarians are instrumental
in maintaining the mobile laptops that are being used in the schools, as well
as helping people get up to speed on a variety of technology initiatives.
Joseph Russo, Principal
of Horace Mann Elementary School, explained that the library/media specialists’
role is very different today than what existed when most people present were in
school. A part-time person simply will
not be able to continue the level of technology support and assistance for
teachers that is currently in place. It
will be very challenging when a teacher needs assistance on a computer or a
particular piece of software and the librarian is not available The Information
Technology (IT) support is only available once a week in each building. A lot of effort has occurred to obtain
technology grants for laptops and computers in the classroom and to rev staff
up so that they can utilize these tools. The librarians were instrumental in assisting
staff with the new Progress Reports, which are about to go on-line. They have also been involved in the Thursday
afternoon program around providing a technology and literacy-based plan that
dovetails with the curriculum.
Marc Laredo asked how
the work of the IT staff interplays with the librarians and whether there is
any overlapping of services.
David Castelline stated
that the library/media and IT specialists work hand-in-hand to facilitate the
integration of technology projects into the curriculum, but the IT specialist
is only available one day a week. The IT
person brings experience from other schools and shares ideas, but the librarian
is the one that supports the project the rest of the time.
Joe Russo added that the
IT specialist delivers the curriculum with the teachers and models it in the
classroom and then releases that responsibility to the librarian, who is
available to help support the initiative.
Nancy Levine worked in
the library at her daughter’s school a number of years ago and can see how the
role has drastically changed. She is
very concerned about the impact of the cuts in terms of losing the amount of
integration and support for the curriculum that is now in place. She would like to entertain the notion of
adding back in at least a portion of these cuts and discuss where they might
share some of this burden by reducing elsewhere in the budget.
Dori Zaleznik would like
to better understand how librarians function in a small vs. large school and if
the services differ.
David Castelline replied
that in a smaller school the library is used less for classes but more for
student groupings, which seem to occur at all times of the day. The librarian in a smaller school is in the
classroom more frequently.
Marilynne Quarcoo,
Principal of Cabot Elementary School, talked about some of the projects that
librarians oversee with students outside of the structured program, such as the
Massachusetts Children’s Book Awards.
Since they were not able to implement the new 4th grade
social studies curriculum this year, the librarian was also instrumental in incorporating
pieces of that through special projects.
She worked with the literacy specialist in obtaining a grant from the
Newton Schools Foundation to identify and procure books around the mathematics/
literacy initiative and conducted independent reading conferences with
students. The school website highlights
much of this work and she encouraged people to take a look. In her mind, the librarian is a teacher,
because she is an integral part of the education of children.
Emily Ostrower,
Principal of Countryside Elementary School, views the work that the librarians
do with the literacy initiative as an integral piece rather than just a support
component. Without the librarian, it
would not be as rich and dynamic an educational program for children. Their librarian is a particularly effective
grant writer, who has secured various grants for their school around the
initiative of integrating technology into the curriculum as an effective
teaching tool, which also builds a sense of team among staff. Another grant was coordinated by the
librarian and literacy specialist in creating evening book discussion groups
for 4th and 5th grade students and this year the
librarian was handed over the job of organizing and overseeing the school book
fair.
Susie Heyman asked if it
would be easy to bring the program back to full-time in the future if it is cut
and if it would be helpful if the Committee could restore some of the program
incrementally.
Jeff Young commented that once
something is reduced it is difficult, but not impossible, to restore. He will have the Director of Information
Technology prepare some thoughts about incremental add-backs for the next
meeting.
Dori Zaleznik asked
about the impact of the cuts in teaching staff and aide positions on the school
experience.
Jeff Young stated that
in some cases they anticipate models of class sizes as high as 27 and 28 and
one of the difficult decisions will be in trying to ascertain the best way to
apportion staffing, i.e., should they spread the burden across all grades or
attempt to keep the kindergarten and first grades lower. The fewer grades they have to work with, the
more intense the increase will be felt at the upper grades. On the other hand, there is the consideration
of the younger students to take into account.
Joe Russo mentioned that
physically there will be less space for students to move around in larger
classes. For teachers there are more
papers to grade and more progress reports to manage. Issues with students on the fringe tend to
escalate in larger classes. Students do
not get as much individual attention.
Having said all this, he admitted that teachers are talented, resilient,
and rise to the occasion and do an outstanding job and children are probably
even more flexible than adults. While he
does not endorse large class sizes and admits that they are challenging, in
these financial times they have become a reality.
Marilynn Quarcoo
mentioned that they already feel the impact of the reductions of the last two
years in terms of aide support. Not many
are utilized anymore for a particular child or specific classroom except for
situations involving safety or medical reasons.
Teaching assistants now have multiple classroom assignments and the
teachers have to organize the curriculum around these schedules. Next year they
envision having to place certain numbers of students together in a classroom in
order to best utilize the aide support. She
is concerned about compromising the learning experience for children, as well
as being in compliance in terms of legal mandates.
Emily Ostrower added
that there will be less flexibility in terms of scheduling and organization of
classrooms. As Marilynn mentioned, with
fewer aides they will be forced to concentrate more children with
special needs in a couple of classrooms.
They will manage and will do it well, but it will mean everyone will be
stretched and some things will get dropped in order to address priorities.
Marc Laredo asked how
they plan to manage without any reserve positions in the budget.
Jeff Young replied that
they felt that the cuts they are proposing are severe enough that they could
not justify reserves, but rather used that funding towards teaching staff.
Marc Laredo wondered if
it might make sense to hold off on making decisions around classroom
organization until the summer, when they have a better idea of the final
outcome of state funding.
Jeff Young responded
that this is a possibility, but they have to weigh the flexibility factor
against the anxiety involved on the part of staff, parents and children in not
knowing class assignments until late in the summer.
Middle Schools
Judy Malone Neville
stated that in reviewing the middle school program, they tried to maintain team
size as their priority, as well as balancing that with keeping breadth of
program where possible.
John Jordan, Principal
of Brown Middle School, emphasized their belief in the middle school
model. This means keeping the team sizes
at an optimal level so that students can make a connection with the teacher, as
well as retaining the notion of “highly
qualified” staff, meaning people teaching in a subject in which they are certified. At this level, they want to provide students
with as many opportunities as possible, because it is a time when they are
experimenting with different interests and experiences. Next year at Brown they are faced with having
to limit the number of sections of French that can be offered. Another area that they are forced to look at
is the possible elimination of media drama.
The one cut that will impact all the middle schools is the literacy
specialists, which he feels will hit the most fragile readers as they make
their transition from the elementary to the secondary level. This is one of the few regular education interventions
they have in place at the middle schools and it is done in different ways in
each building. For instance, at Day it
might involve students working on The
Daytime newspaper, which results in additional reading support. There will be more MCAS testing in reading next
year in grades six and eight.
Jeff Young interceded
that if the reduction of the specialists at the middle schools occurs, they
will have to consider different ways to utilize resources within the district
because the needs of these students must be met. He then asked if they could describe the
impact of the possibility of moving from a four-person team to a three, which
is under consideration in some cases.
Judy Malone Neville mentioned
that Oak Hill has successfully used a two-teacher team model for some time and
there have been a variety of different team configurations at various times in
the schools depending on enrollment at a particular grade level. The drawback of some of these team configurations
is that it requires the teachers to teach a common subject, usually social
studies, and they are not necessarily certified in that field. It is also more difficult on staff when the
model changes from year-to-year.
Marc Laredo asked if
there is any thought to standardizing the team configurations and/or electives
at the middle schools and whether that would achieve any budgetary savings.
John Jordan explained
that there have been many discussions around finding commonalties and realizing
economies so that students have similar experiences no matter which middle
school they attend, while still retaining the individuality of the buildings.
Marc Laredo asked if
there is any savings associated with using the two-teacher team model.
Judy Malone Neville
replied that there is no cost savings involved.
However, they may be able to realize some cost savings in offering a
program where staff could share teaching at Brown and Oak Hill, given their
proximity. Another thought would be a
decision to teach certain languages at each school and allow a form of school
choice where students would attend the school where the language was that they
wanted to study. They have a fairly
consistent athletic program at all the middle schools and are trying to move in
that direction in music and art.
Dori Zaleznik asked wanted
to know the impact of allowing team sizes to creep up to the vicinity of 95.
Judy Malone Neville
acknowledged that they have actually had teams of this size in the past and were able to manage, although it is not optimal.
Anne Larner asked about
extra curricular activities.
Judy Malone Neville
stated that they will continue to offer the Enrichment, Excellence &
Exploration (EEE) program, but they may have to curtail some of the offerings
so that they do not run the entire year and there may be fewer opportunities
for new clubs to form. They have also
been discussing the possible elimination of some sports but have not made any
concrete decisions at this point.
Marc Laredo is confused
by talks about cuts to the athletic program when the line item indicates an
increase.
Sandy Guryan replied
that there is more than one line item that encompasses this and she believes it
has to do with step increases in the coaches salaries,
but she will provide more specific materials for the next meeting.
Jeff Young added that
there will be a full analysis of athletics at both the middle and high schools
for the next meeting in terms of cuts and/or increased fees.
Susie Heyman asked what
percentage of the EEE/athletics line item is devoted to each area.
Judy Malone Neville
replied that it is probably 75% athletics and 25% EEE, because the athletics
includes salaries of coaches and transportation.
Gail Glick asked how
prevalent it will be to have staff teaching a subject for which they are not
certified and if they will have supports for those teachers in place.
Judy Malone Neville
responded that the recommendations call for a reduction of a team teacher at
the 6th grade level at Bigelow, Brown and Day dictated by the
enrollment figures. The curriculum
coordinators have been very responsive in providing support for teachers who
are picking up a new assignment on Thursday afternoon early release days and in
summer preparation work.
Todd Harrison stated
that with the right amount of support, it can be successful because it can
allow for greater interdisciplinary activity if teachers are dual
certified. However, to some staff it is
an unpopular assignment and can be difficult finding teachers who are willing
to take on this task. The greatest
detriment is the instability that arises from year to year, which makes it hard
to staff and plan. The program becomes
more solidified as teachers work together for a period of time and it can take
several years to develop solid curriculum.
They make every attempt to give these people sufficient curriculum
development time because they have to do double preparation and he hopes to
provide even more of that in the future.
Nancy Levine asked where
they stand around the decision with regard to the elimination of the Daytime.
Jeff Young stated that
the decision has not yet been made and they are all in agreement about the
excellent of this newspaper and their desire to preserve it, if possible.
Dori Zaleznik would
appreciate seeing some more specifics about the cuts because it is difficult to
make decisions without understanding the ramifications.
High Schools
Judy Malone Neville
explained that they are only at the beginning stages of the scheduling process
at the high schools, so the cuts are somewhat vague and where they are specific
they should be considered potentials vs. actuals.
Susie Heyman asked if
they could explain the scheduling process and how they decide which courses will
be offered.
Michael Welch, Principal
of Newton South High School, explained that the course offering booklet is
distributed and students are encouraged to select their first choice, as well
as alternatives. The accumulated data
then determines how the numbers fall and what courses will be offered. Sometimes they will offer courses in a
rotation schedule every other year. He
expects they will be making these decisions mid to late April.
Susie Heyman asked how
they balance allowing students to self-select courses of interest with what
educators feel constitutes a proper high school education, i.e., graduation
requirements.
Jennifer Huntington,
Principal of Newton North High School, stated that they will have some serious
challenges next year around attempting to keep the breathe of program that
allows students to feel connected to the school given the cuts they will be
facing. However, there is a lot of input
from the guidance counselors and teachers to help students make these
decisions.
Michael Welch added that
they try to look at the individual choices of a student. If they cannot give them the specific course
they want, they attempt to fit them into something similar, although that
sometimes means the class will be larger.
Susie Heyman commented
that this is the third year in a row that they are experiencing cuts at this
level and the results were quite dramatic when they saw how many classes had
over 25 students.
Mike Welch agreed. While the high schools are fare more
efficient than they have ever been in the past, they can only go so far before
they tip the scales. He believes the
majority of the honors and curriculum 1 level courses next year will have large
sections because there are no other variables available to manipulate.
Jennifer Huntington
stated that they are slated to lose 11.1 FTEs, part of which is the transfer of
staff to South as part of the equalization of the high school population. She asked the five major departments to
consider the impact of a 2.0 FTE on their budget. The responses to date have been that there
will be a loss of electives, class sizes for honors and curriculum 1 classes
will be in the high 20s, and there will be more advanced placements classes
taught in lecture format, with reduced writing assignments. Overall there will be far less flexibility
and the school environment will feel very different.
Dori Zaleznik noted that
math and science classes at both high schools continue to be areas in which the
core classes are quite large and she wondered if there is any way of
redistributing those numbers. She also
wondered if the high schools could share some of the electives via video
conferencing.
Mike Welch stated that
they will be taking away some of the electives in order to keep the class sizes
down as much as possible. He reminded
people that there is a contractual cap in place in the English Dept. Newton South is gaining 115 students and only
adding 2.0 FTEs, so they are not even close to the current class size with that
allocation. Seventy-five percent of that
allocation will go to the English Dept.
He explained that they have made previous attempts at tele-videoing
courses, which has proven difficult because of scheduling and other issues. The number of instances where they can
accomplish this is fairly minimal. However,
there are 25 slots available in the fall and spring for students to participate
in a virtual high school project, which allows for them to offer some of these type of opportunities.
Anne Larner asked about
other areas that might be impacted by this budget, such as drama.
Jennifer Huntington
explained that drama is a revolving fund and is not impacted by the cuts. In terms of athletics, while they will be
discussing this at the next meeting, she wanted to state that the notion of
raising the athletic fees by $25 to eliminate any loss of program has her
unequivocal support. A survey of 29
communities in eastern
Susie Heyman asked about
the impact of the cuts in the number of aides.
Mike Welch admitted that
they have not even begun discussion around this area and actually do not have
many aides in their buildings other than those assigned for special
education. He did, however, want to
address the department head reorganization in case people were not clear. Each of the small departments at Newton South
– art, music, family & consumer science, career & tech ed – have a
person who teaches 90% of the time and heads the department the other 10%. Their role is to oversee the interests of the
department in terms of negotiations, budget, and assist with decision-making
around deployment in the best manner in their area. Eliminating this piece means the oversight
will be in the hands of people who are not specialists in the area, such as the
assistant principals and housemasters, so it would be administered from a
distance and would not carry the level of advocacy for the department that is
currently in place.
Jennifer Huntington
agreed with Mike’s comments, but mentioned that one positive piece is that
these people would return to full-time teaching status, so it would slightly
increase opportunities for students.
Marc Laredo noted that
the budget book indicates a reduction of aides at the secondary level of 4.0
FTEs, but they have been discussing much higher numbers and he asked for an
explanation.
Jeff Young stated that
this is another line item issue and will be clarified in the materials for the
next meeting.
Anne Larner asked if
there is anything else the principals would like to add to the discussion this
evening that may not have been addressed.
Jennifer Huntington
commented that what makes
Mike Welch added that
they are boxed in because the only variable remaining is class size. If the budget remains as is, the large AP
classes will be taught in a college-like format. They have been overloading
their teachers to the point where their total student load has grown every year
since he has been Principal at Newton South.
This wears staff down and they are less enthusiastic about taking on
advisory roles for clubs after school because they are tired and simply do not
have the time. The block set aside daily
for students to meet with teachers for extra help is seeing lines growing and
it is becoming increasingly difficult for students to get the attention they
need.
Susie Heyman asked if
there was any way they could enhance summer offerings to compensate for some of
this loss.
Mike Welch replied in
the affirmative, but it is not the same experience for students. A very small increment of staffing at the
high school level can make a great deal of difference. For example, a .25 FTE can impact
approximately 350 students.
OPEN DISCUSSION
Suzanne Freidberg,
Newton Centre,
Neil Silverston, Newton
Centre, commented that the school system definitely needs more money, but no
amount of overrides is going to sustain the growth that the Superintendent says
is needed to maintain program every year.
They need to face this fact now and address the class size issue. He suggested they attack the utilities
accounts and address the inefficient boilers, air-conditioners and heating
systems, which will result in savings fairly quickly. Another area they could address would be
special education. While he feels
Lisa Davis, Newton
Highlands, Copresident of Countryside PTSO, talked about the importance of the
librarians, which she considers true partners with teachers, as they work together
on curriculum related projects. They are
also skilled technology specialists and a critical piece to its integration
into the classroom. They are the most
knowledgeable about children’s literature and literacy. The librarian at Countryside knows all the
children by name and their personal interests and is able to match the right
books for each student. This is not an
easy task in a school of their size. The
librarian personally expanded her daughter’s non-fiction only passion into a
fiction fanatic. The proposed cuts would
mean fewer library visits, less time to browse, less access to use of
technology, and less schoolwide support.
She urged the Committee to do all they can to stave off these cuts.
Susan Flicop, Chestnut
Hill, Bowen parent, stated that her daughter is currently in a kindergarten
class with 25 students and she is concerned that this is going to be an ongoing
situation. The numbers indicate that
there will be too many unacceptable situations at their school. While the class size reports 58 students next
year for kindergarten, they are counting 76, with 20 families that have not yet
responded. In terms of the libraries,
she fully supports their cause, but not at the expense of cuts in the
arts. They need to find another
solution. Perhaps less technology for
students in the early grades would be a better option.
Andrew Gottleib, Newton
Centre, mentioned that the model for projecting class size has not worked well
for their school and he urged them to conduct their analysis by using the
numbers their community has prepared, which are the most accurate. He is also concerned that the issue of class
size at the elementary level did not merit more discussion this evening. They need to have some blunt discussions
about other areas that can be reduced because they are headed in a bad
direction.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was
adjourned at