NEWTON SCHOOL COMMITTEE

MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING - MAY 13, 2002

EDUCATION CENTER, FRAZIER ROOM, 7:30 P.M.

 

PRESENT:               Chairperson Anne Larner, Vice-Chairperson Susan Albright, Gail Glick, Patricia Kellogg, Marc Laredo, Leslie Schneider, Dori Zaleznik, Mayor David Cohen,

                                    Lindsay Dahlben, student representative Newton North High School

 

ABSENT:                 Nancy Levine and student representative – Newton South High School

 

CALL TO ORDER

 

Chairperson Anne Larner called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m.  She announced that Nancy Levine is absent due to back surgery and is expected to return at the next meeting.

 

 

PUBLIC COMMENT

 

There were no members of the public who wished to address the Committee at this time.

 

 

STUDENT REPRESENTATIVES' DISCUSSION

 

None.

 

 

RECOGNITIONS

 

There were no recognitions.

 

APPROVAL OF SCHOOL COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES

 

MOTION:    It was moved to approve minutes from the

                        following School Committee meetings:

 

executive session – 1/30/02

                                    special meeting – 1/30/02

special meeting - 2/6/02

 

                        (Zaleznik – Albright)

 

                                    7 – 0 – 2

 

                        Absent for vote:  Mayor Cohen

                        Absent for meeting:  Levine

 

 

 

PUBLIC HEARING/VOTE ON SCHOOL CHOICE

 

Anne Larner explained that, by law, they are required to hold a public hearing on school choice.  Traditionally, they have never participated in the program.  There were no members of the public who wished to address the Committee on this topic.

 

Superintendent Jeff Young added that Newton has never participated in this program for several reasons.  First, there is a lack of space to accept students from outside the system.  But, more importantly, it is an ill-conceived program where funding follows the students from poorer communities to those with more affluence.  This is not the answer to improving schools.

 

Anne Larner noted that Belmont has just opted to participate in school choice, as one of the few west suburban communities to do so.  They were driven purely by economic reasons, in order to save four teaching positions, and it was with reluctance that they took this vote. 

 

Dori Zaleznik asked if there has been any review of the program since its inception.

 

Jeff Young stated that he has not seen anything official.

 

Dori Zaleznik mentioned sending a letter to the Department of Education requesting an evaluation of the program, which could indicate that it is not living up to expectations, possibly resulting in amending of the law.

 

Jeff Young indicated that it is worthwhile to send a letter.  However, there is little support for changing the law in the legislature because it has a groundswell of support, along with vouchers and charter schools.

 

MOTION:    It was moved that the Newton school system not participate in the Massachusetts School Choice

Program for the 2002-2003 academic year. 

                                   

                                                            (Albright – Mayor Cohen)

 

                                                                        8 – 0 – 1

 

                                                                  Absent:  Levine

 

 

 

 

PRESENTATION FROM HEALTH DEPARTMENT

 

David Naparstek, Health Commissioner, thanked the Committee for the opportunity to provide this update on the school health programs.  He recognized a number of people in the audience associated with the program – all who work diligently around the safety and health of the children in the Newton Public Schools.  He introduced Linda Walsh, Director of Clinical Services, who will assist him in conducting this presentation.  The reason their program is so effective is because of the cooperative effort between the city and school departments in coordinating services.  Their responsibilities include everything from daily nursing care to environmental issues, such as air quality and integrated pest management programs in the buildings.  Their department also works closely with Chartwells, the food service provider, on health and nutrition issues.  They are involved in lead and asbestos consultation, as well as sewer backups, odors, flooding, and evacuations.  The city and school information technology departments also work in tandem managing the information systems and keeping data updated.  He then talked about a life-saving device pilot program at Newton North High School, where they recently installed automatic external defibrillators, with plans to expand that to Newton South next year.  Their staff consists of 24 nurses who work in the school buildings, two community health nurses, a school physician, four health assistants, and an audiologist.  Eighty-five percent of their resources are committed to the schools.

 

Linda Walsh talked about the role of a school nurse, which has evolved tremendously over the years.  Their responsibility is to advance the wellbeing, academic success, and lifelong achievement of students.  The nurse facilitates positive student responses to normal development, promotes health and safety, intervenes with health issues, provides case management services, and actively collaborates with others to build a student/family program of self-advocacy and learning.  On a daily basis, some of the things they are required to do are to deliver medication to students, address emergency situations, model health programs in the classroom, and provide community support, where needed.  They must also comply with immunization requirements and state mandated health screenings.  The Massachusetts Department of Public Health Enhanced School Services Grant was instrumental in moving them toward their goal of having a full-time nurse in every school, which they hope to reach by 2003. To the grant has also allowed them to upgrade their management information system software, as well as train their staff in its use.  She then talked about the data that tracks the number of and reasons for visits to the health rooms by both staff and students during the course of the year.  She also mentioned some of the high-risk medical needs, such as

 

 

 

asthma, allergies, and diabetes, as well as vision, hearing, and other screenings required by law. 

 

Leslie Schneider asked about coverage for the schools without a full-time nurse.

 

Linda Walsh explained that one nurse shares time between Pierce and Zervas; the only two elementary schools without a full-time position.  The health assistant is available in the building when the nurse is at the other school.

 

Mayor Cohen inquired about changes in the nursing profession in the past 10 years and any impact that may have had on services.

 

Linda Walsh replied that the biggest change is in the needs of the population.  At one time, these students would have been treated at home or in hospitals for certain ailments or medical requirements.  A full-time professional nurse can address issues such as feeding tubes, tracheotomies, etc.  Without this level of service these children would be sitting at home waiting for a visiting nurse and not being mainstreamed into the learning environment, which is where they belong. 

 

Jeff Young asked about any trends in terms of psychotropic medications, such as anti-depressants or Ritalin.

 

Linda Walsh stated that there appears to be more children on these type of medications than there were 10 years ago.  However, since they did not collect this type of data until just recently, this is anecdotal information.  There are also time-released medications that can be taken at home rather than during the school day, which can also skew the data. 

 

Marc Laredo asked about proactive approaches to their work.

 

David Naparstek reiterated that the defibrillators are a proactive approach, as is their work with the Melanoma Foundation to promote safe sun practices.  Nurses are used in the classroom to help model programs such as hand washing, to promote the prevention of the spread of diseases.  It is this ability to be utilized as a resource in the classroom that is the most effective method of proactive work.

 

Linda Walsh mentioned some of their future goals in terms of being proactive.  Given the population at the high schools, they hope to be able to support two nurses in each of those buildings.  They also hope to be able to continue to develop their role as an integral part of the teaching team in a

 

 

 

building by becoming more mobile in a school rather than sitting in the health room waiting for visitors. 

 

Marc Laredo asked about the role of the health assistants.

 

Linda Walsh explained that each high school has a health assistant, another is shared among the four middle schools and the fourth floats between Pierce and Zervas.  These people assist the nurses in whatever duties are required, particularly having to do with screening programs. 

 

Susan Albright asked if the nursing staff is outfitted with cellular phones or beepers, in case of emergencies.

 

Linda Walsh replied that while some utilize two-way radios, each school addresses this issue in the way that works best for that building.

 

Gail Glick asked which health education programs are formalized in the schools.

 

Linda Walsh stated that currently they are all building-based programs rather than centralized.  They are working with the physical education coordinator to introduce programs around osteoporosis and nutrition, as well as a tobacco program.  Unfortunately, most of it is informal at this time, as they have to compete with all the other needs in the schools in a limited timeframe.  She would like to see some of this work formalized because she feels they are under-utilizing the talents of these professionals. 

 

Gail Glick asked how often students seek advice around medical questions from nurses.

 

Linda Walsh stated that teachable moments occur throughout the school day and the staff attempts to capitalize on these times, whether it be issues around stress, peer pressures, etc.

 

Dori Zaleznik asked about the defibrillator pilot and who is trained in its usage.

 

Linda Walsh responded that the physical educator and nurse are currently trained in its usage.  However, when presenting the training at the high school, numerous staff members expressed interest in being certified.  They can also be incorporated into the training of students in the program.  There will be four located in the building, which can be used on any person who happens to be in the building and in need.  There are numerous athletic events, extra-curricular activities, and community education

 

 

programs occurring in the schools serving a very large population.  Newton is ahead of other communities in this area.

 

Patty Kellogg asked how they plan to find the time to structure a program for nurses to work in the classroom. 

 

Linda Walsh is confident that she could structure programs in conjunction with principals, as currently occurs in some schools. 

 

Anne Larner is pleased with the growth of this program and the collaboration between the city and schools.  Sitting on the planning committee for the high school renovation project, she sees firsthand the incredible involvement of the health department in the planning process.

 

 

REPORTS

 

SUPERINTENDENT’S PERSONNEL REPORT

 

Jeff Young announced the appointment of Pamela Appleton, Principal of Angier Elementary School, effective July, replacing Ruth Chapman, who will be retiring.  Cindy Marchand, current Principal of Williams Elementary School will be taking over the Principalship of Franklin Elementary School, and Hank Van Putten, Assistant Principal at Oak Hill Middle School, will now serve as Acting Principal at Williams.  He thanked the screening committees who worked tirelessly and were beneficial in helping him reach his recommendations.  Informal courtesy interviews for Ms. Appleton and Mr. Van Putten will be forthcoming at future School Committee meetings.

 

 

FY02 BUDGET UPDATE

 

Jeff Young reported on the $52,376 positive balance in the FY02 budget, which continues the trend that has consistently been reported for the past few months.  However, they continue to anticipate costs exceeding budget in the area of maintenance. 

 

 

SPECIAL EDUCATION UPDATE

 

Jeff Young noted that the special education report is also consistent with previous updates.  The out-of-district tuition account is slightly under budget, as is special education aides.  However, contracted services are slightly over budget and they expect a wash at year’s end.  Finally, he

 

 

mentioned that Medicaid payments have tripled this quarter, which bodes well for the City’s future claims. 

 

Marc Laredo asked if they are still trying to fill gaps in aide positions.

 

Carl Daynard, Assistant Superintendent for Pupil Services, replied that the only positions currently being filled are for new move-ins that require an aide or if someone leaves that needs a replacement.

 

 

DISCUSSION ITEMS

 

DISCUSSION RE:  COMPLIANCE WITH CHILDREN’S INTERNET PROTECTION ACT (CIPA) REQUIREMENTS

 

Jeff Young noted that the deadline for voting on this subject is October.  There are two steps to complying with the Children’s Internet Protection Act.  The first requires a name change from “acceptable use” to “Internet safety act.”  The second has to do with adopting a filter.  If they choose not to comply, there would be a $19,000 loss of revenue.  The larger issue is the fact that they could also be impacted by loss of state and federal grant funding.  The filter itself acts to edit out sexually explicit sites from children’s access, but allows for local discretion with regard to releasing the filter from any particular web site.  A survey of neighboring communities indicates that most have proceeded with compliance.  He wished to go on record as being in support of this policy.

 

Marc Laredo asked if the filtering applies to staff as well as students and if it relates to email.

 

Fran Zilonis, Information Technology Coordinator, stated that the Cyber Patrol filter program would apply to anyone accessing the Internet in the school district and only to the Internet and not email. 

 

Susan Albright noted that this is a complex and controversial issue.  She asked if there are different policies and contracts for the various grade levels. 

 

Fran Zilonis stated that it is a systemwide policy that would be signed by parents at the elementary level.  The topic would be discussed at parent information nights, as well as in the school newsletters and in the Students’ Rights and Responsibilities Handbook.  Staff will work directly with children to teach them how to appropriately use search engines and channeling them in the right direction.  It will also be explained to them that if they end up in a site that is uncomfortable or troubling they should immediately tell the teacher. 

 

 

Susan Albright stated that filters are not reliable because they do not filter out everything and often filter out things that they would not want

filtered.  The companies reserve their privacy rights and do not explain their filtering process.  The filter is not infallible.

 

Fran Zilonis agreed that it is not perfect.  However, it works to some degree as one method of defense against these sites.

 

Susan Albright asked if teachers are trained in teaching children how to use the Internet.

 

Fran Zilonis replied that there are two on-line courses currently being sponsored by the Newton Schools Foundation.  However, given the number of teachers in the system that will require training, it is going to take some time. 

 

Susan Albright is troubled by the fact that the software does not offer a different filter for various grade levels. 

 

Patty Kellogg is also concerned that high school students may not be able to access sites that would be appropriate for their grade level because the filter is geared to younger children.  She asked about the override process.

 

Fran Zilonis stated that the teacher would notify the network manager to unblock a particular site and within 24 hours that site would be made available.

 

Patty Kellogg wondered why a signed contract around this subject matter is necessary.

 

Fran Zilonis explained that this is something supported by the American Association of School Librarians, International Society for Technology Education, and various superintendent and principal organizations.  It is a means of protecting school systems from any illegal action or trouble that students may get in as a result of using the Internet.

 

Gail Glick asked about other communities’ filters.

 

Fran Zilonis stated that many communities use the Macintosh filtering software, while others filter locally, which is what Newton has chosen, because it allows for greater control over unblocking sites.  They actually purchased the software a year ago, as part of the firewall package and have already conducted a trial run, which was quite effective. 

 

Gail Glick mentioned that Lexington has chosen not to filter their system.

 

 

Fran Zilonis mentioned that Lexington does not participate in e-rate reimbursement and, therefore, will not lose that funding as a result of not being in compliance.  However, they will not be able to access any

technology grant funding and it is her understanding that they are rethinking their position.

 

Dori Zaleznik commented that more than a monetary issue, they should go on record stating that children should not have total access to everything on the Internet.  Part of the responsibility of the school system is helping students learn how to properly search.  While no filtering system is perfect, it is one piece that should be used along with their educational mission.  She does not view this as censorship and believes they would be remiss if they did not utilize this software. 

Leslie Schneider asked about restricting elementary students to pre-bookmarked sites, such as Lexington does.

 

Fran Zilonis is disturbed by that concept because it does not teach children how to properly find and evaluate information in a responsible manner. 

 

Carolyn Wyatt, Assistant Superintendent of Curriculum & Instruction, added that they have had discussions about providing teachers with resources to select sites for particular types of assignments, which will direct students to specific research areas and sites rather than just giving them unlimited access.

 

Marc Laredo believes they all agree with the general principle, but are struggling with the details.  He feels that Lexington’s model has some merit.

 

Fran Zilonis talked about the Web Quest program, which is a controlled way to direct children to use the Internet, but which allows them some opportunity for additional searches.  There are many times when this approach makes the most sense, particularly if the teacher is utilizing the Internet for research purposes for a specific topic rather than doing a lesson on use of the search engine.  A lot of what they do when first exposing children to the Internet is very directed and as they progress and learn more they begin to develop the skills to do their own research.  A great deal of educational material in the future is going to be delivered through this medium and it will play a larger role in people’s lives.  

 

Susan Albright still believes that they should not apply the same filter to both kindergarten and high school students.  There are a couple of search engines for children that are filtered that she feels would be more

 

 

 

appropriate.  She believes this is a dollar-driven policy because of its relationship to a possible loss of funding.

 

Anne Larner asked if there was any feedback from staff on this subject.

 

Fran Zilonis stated that the instructional technology specialists and elementary library specialists favor the filter, but the high school librarians do not. 

 

Carolyn Wyatt will have some further conversations with department heads, to see if they have any concerns.

 

Dori Zaleznik asked if the system can unblock a site for a selected period of time and then resume filtering.

 

Fran Zilonis replied in the affirmative.  This is one of the benefits of local control.

 

Dori Zaleznik commented that they could try the software for a period of time and then review it at some future point.  They are not locked into permanent use of one type of filter.

 

Fran Zilonis stated that it is her intention to make this an initial pilot to see if it is responsive to their needs.

 

Anne Larner’s main concern has to do with the ease and timeliness of unblocking. 

 

Carolyn Wyatt mentioned that it was not problematic in their initial testing period.

 

 

PROPOSAL FOR IMPROVING SCHOOL-BASED DEVELOPMENT OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLANS

 

Jim Marini, Associate Superintendent for Secondary Education, provided some background on the history of the School Improvement Plans, which arose from the Education Reform Act, and which are developed by the School Council to help advise the principal in identifying goals, issues, and initiatives that need addressing in their building.  Currently the plans are developed in the fall and presented to the School Committee in November.  It is felt that this is not the best timeframe and that it would be more effective to present these to the Committee in the spring, which would allow for a more meaningful discussion prior to their implementation in

 

 

 

the fall.  In addition, rather than having annual approval of the plans, they would like to cycle in a multi-year process.

 

Marilynnene Quarcoo, Principal of Cabot Elementary School, talked about the importance of the School Council in helping her to focus on goals for the management of the school.  They have come to realize that their School Improvement Plans are generally multi-year initiatives, that are linked to the school system goals.  Each school has to have flexibility to allow for space for the dynamic nature of the learning process and unanticipated things that can come up over the course of the year, which could force adjustments to the plans. Changing to a two to three year window would help them work on their goals in a more productive and reasonable approach.

 

Paul Stein, Principal of Day Middle School, stated that he views the School Improvement Plan as a combination action and vision blueprint.  The current schedule for implementing and approving the plan is cumbersome, as he has had to ask the previous Council to return in the fall to develop the plan, while the new Council works on its implementation.  Some schools utilize the new Council to do both, which is difficult for people not familiar with the process.  A multi-year process would allow for more continuity. 

 

Michael Welch, Principal of Newton South High School, reiterated how difficult it is to have a new group of teachers and parents develop a complex plan in a matter of a few meetings, when they have not even had time to gel as a group.  It is nearly impossible to have quality dialogue under these circumstances and usually you end up with a laundry list of individual needs.  This year they worked on developing the goals in the spring.  These plans have a seasonal nature that requires a longer timeframe for implementing, revising, and assessing.  It would be beneficial if they could formalize this process so that all schools are working in a similar manner.

 

Gail Glick served on a School Council for a number of years and understands the practicality of having more than a few months to identify and accomplish goals.  She asked if they could be more specific about the plan under the new system, in terms of short and long-term goals.

 

Marilynne Quarcoo replied that seven years ago Cabot conducted an in-depth survey around a variety of subjects, i.e., core values, curriculum, challenge, communication, and homework, to name a few.  They then identified priorities and determined which of the areas could be addressed short-term and which would require a longer commitment.  Since that time, the school community has changed and they have conducted another survey to see how they had progressed and where revisions to the

 

 

plan might be necessary.  As new families enter the school, some of the work has to be repeated, such as understanding of special education

programs and the METCO program.  They continue to work on the literacy initiative, and that has been incorporated into the goals. 

 

Gail Glick wondered if constant turnover on the Council is problematic in terms of maintaining goals.

 

All the principals stated that they rotate membership as one means of keeping some stability on the Council and not having total changeover every year.

 

Mayor Cohen served on the first Newton South High School Council and agrees with the importance of some consistency in membership.

 

Marc Laredo believes that it makes sense to set the goals at the end of the year, so that a clearly defined plan is in place when school opens.  From listening to the principals this evening, it appears that there are actually two plans – one being the broader goals that require several years to implement; the other being action items which can be completed in a year’s timeframe.  He wondered if a three-year action plan with updates in May would be a workable solution.

 

Michael Welch agreed that separating items into short and long-term goals has been helpful to him when developing the plans.  He likes Mr. Laredo’s idea.

 

Paul Stein suggested staggering the reports so that the Committee is not having to review and comment on all 21 schools in a given year.

 

Dori Zaleznik served on the Countryside School Council and they moved from developing their plan in the fall to having it fleshed out the previous spring and found that it worked much better.  The only danger she sees to moving the timeframe out would be a failure to account for concrete actions and the possibility of not following-through with set goals.  While she does not believe the schools necessarily need to report to the School Committee annually, she would like to be certain that part of their charge is that they be required to assess their plan internally on a regular basis. 

 

Anne Larner commented that the Education Reform Act may require certain mandated reporting timelines, so they will have to review that information.  She also mentioned that historically the School Committee has been a passive receiver of the School Improvement Plans.  It would be helpful to hear from the schools as to what type of feedback would be most desirable.

 

Susan Albright added that the School Improvement Plans are really the grassroots work that occur at the building level.  The questions they need to address are what do the plans collectively tell them about the needs of the system and to what extent that data can be used in a valuable way.

 

Jeff Young mentioned that the type of survey that has been done at Cabot might be a good way of gathering this kind of information.

 

Marilynne Quarcoo believes that the School Councils would appreciate a more active and connective role with the School Committee.

 

Patty Kellogg asked if there are vehicles for communication between the School Councils themselves.

 

Michael Welch talked about the relationship that the high school councils have developed.  This year they held a joint meeting and the political action subcommittees of the councils have worked hard at developing statements around the budget and override.

 

Marilynne Quarcoo mentioned that there has been some discussion about having a similar meeting with the elementary councils.

 

Leslie Schneider asked about the role of the student representatives on the councils at the high schools.

 

Michael Welch admitted that at Newton South it has been a hard task to find students willing to serve and then keeping their interest.  They are struggling with how to meet this challenge.

 

ACTION ITEMS

 

VOTE ON DONATION:  DAY MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENT ACTIVITY ACCOUNT

 

            MOTION:    It was moved to authorize a new interest-bearing

                                    Day Middle School gift account and to accept the                      

                                    transfer of $10,000 into this account from the

                                    Day Middle School student activity account;

and to increase the maximum balance on all middle

                                    School agency (student activity) accounts from

                                    $50,000 to $70,000.

 

                                                                        (Zaleznik – Glick)

 

                                                                                    8 – 0 – 1

                                                                           Absent:  Levine

 

 

VOTE ON DONATIONS

 

            MOTION:    It was moved to accept the following donations, as

outlined in Attachment G:

 

                                    A bench to the Education Center, in memory of

Debbie Ellis, from her friends and colleagues;

 

$250 for the Early Childhood Program from Paul Stein and Susan Hurwit;

 

$2,230 to the One to One (Big Brother) Program, in

memory of Sean Parrish Labrecque Galliher, from

family and friends;

           

$500 to the Mason-Rice Elementary School, from

an anonymous donor;

 

$500 to the Angier Elementary School Technology

Drive, from Barbara & Neil Collins.

 

 

VOTE TO ACCEPT GRANTS

 

            MOTION:      It was moved to accept the new grants totaling

                                    $99,519, as outlined in Attachment H.

 

                                                                        (Laredo – Albright)

 

                                                                                    8 – 0 – 1

 

                                                                            Absent:  Levine

 

 

COMMUNICATIONS

 

Dori Zaleznik mentioned correspondence from the Cambridge School Committee with regard to the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) exam as a graduation requirement and that community’s decision not to adhere to the law.   She believes the Committee needs to have their own discussion about this subject in the early fall next year and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

perhaps link it to their pending deliberations around Newton’s graduation requirements. 

 

Jeff Young mentioned that the previous School Committee had a lot of discussion about this subject and that information might be a good starting point for the new Committee.  In addition, they need to address the issue of whether to continue awarding diplomas to students who are home-schooled and not required to take the MCAS exam. 

 

Anne Larner believes that early fall is a good time to bring up this subject.  They will also need to include in that discussion options for seniors at risk of failing the exam and not graduating next year.

 

 

PUBLIC COMMENT

 

There were no members of the public who wished to address the Committee at this time.

 

 

ADJOURNMENT

 

The meeting was adjourned at 9:50 p.m.