NEWTON SCHOOL
COMMITTEE
MINUTES
OF REGULAR MEETING – NOVEMBER 27, 2000
EDUCATION
CENTER, FRAZIER ROOM, 7:30 P.M.
PRESENT: Chairperson
Verne Vance, Vice-Chairperson Anne Borg, Susan Albright, Rodney Barker, Susan
Heyman, Anne Larner, Nancy Levine, Andris Vizulis, James Tierney, student
representative – Newton North High School
ABSENT: Mayor
David Cohen and student representative, Newton
South
High School
OPEN SESSION
At 6:00 p.m., it was
announced that the Committee would entertain a motion to convene in executive
session.
MOTION: It was
moved, by roll call vote, to convene in executive session for the purpose of
discussing matters related to collective bargaining. If passed, the Committee will reconvene in open session at 7:30
p.m.
(Levine
- Larner)
8 – 0 - 1
Absent for vote: Mayor Cohen
ROLL CALL VOTE BY WARD:
Ward I, “yes” (Vizulis);
Ward II, "yes" (Albright); Ward III, "yes" (Larner); Ward
IV, "yes", (Levine); Ward V, "yes" (Heyman); Ward VI, “yes”
(Barker); Ward VII, "yes" (Vance); Ward VIII, “yes”, (Borg); Mayor
David Cohen, absent for vote
CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Verne Vance
called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION
There were no members of
the public who wished to address the Committee at this time.
STUDENT REPRESENTATIVES’ DISCUSSION
None.
RECOGNITIONS
None.
APPROVAL OF SCHOOL COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES
MOTION: It
was moved to approve the School Committee
executive session meeting minutes
of 10/27/00.
(Larner
– Albright)
7 – 0 – 2
Absent
for vote: Barker
Absent: Mayor Cohen
REPORTS
REPORT FROM HEALTH COMMISSIONER ON STATUS OF HEALTH
SERVICES
David Naparstek, Health
Commissioner, thanked the Committee for the opportunity to talk about the work
of their department and the challenges that lie ahead. The Health Department has been providing
quality health care services to the school system, largely through the support
from the present City administration.
They currently have 20 nurses, whereas ten years ago that number was
only eight. The increased staff is a
direct result of growth in service demands brought about by such things as
inclusion programs and the medical health needs of the special education
population. Fortunately, they continue
to receive grant funding from the Tobacco Control Program, which assists in
providing staffing and technology for the health rooms
Linda Walsh, Director of
Clinical Services, presented the program using overheads. As a result of the grant funding from the
Massachusetts Department of Public Health, last year they were able to purchase
23 computers and a new software program, as well as equipment for the health
rooms, which their budget was not able to support. This year they were able to hire an additional RN, a part-time RN,
and increase the school physician’s hours to consult with non-public
schools. The learning curve for the new
computers and software programs
has been intense. They did some summer training and will need
much more, in order to utilize the program to its full capacity.
She then showed the increased
numbers of diagnostic medical needs over the past 10 years, the number of
health room visits in a two month period, and the number of students on
medication. They are currently in their
second year of a five-year plan to place a nurse in every building.
She then listed the
various types of procedures that are performed on a daily basis in the health
room. Staff has to be trained to deal
with seizures, allergies, asthma, diabetes, etc. They are committed to addressing children’s needs within the
building and keeping them in school whenever possible, because they do not want
to interrupt the educational process.
Absenteeism for conditions such as asthma has decreased tremendously
because the therapy can now be done in the buildings. In addition to addressing
the needs of the children, nurses also treat staff problems.
Finally, nursing
certification under the Department of Education (DOE) has been a huge hurdle
and it is difficult to find licensed staff.
Certification is very different than what it was 10 years ago. Once nurses are hired, they have to obtain
certification within five years, including expertise in pediatrics, medical
technology, and acute care settings.
In terms of future goals,
they would like to have more health assistants in the large middle schools where
there is only one nurse. They would
like to become more involved in health education programming and hope to work
with the school department, as renovations are conducted on the various buildings,
in order to obtain more appropriate space for their needs.
David Naparstek completed
the presentation by mentioning that
they would like to return in the spring with more accurate data from their new
computerized system.
Andy Vizulis asked abbot
the rise in numbers visiting the health rooms.
David Naparstek mentioned
that the food allergy issue is one source for increased health room
visits. In addition, there is better
diagnoses and management of asthma. In
the past, these children would have stayed home, but now these problems can be
treated in the schools.
Andy Vizulis asked if
there are cases of children being in school who should rightfully be at
home.
Linda Walsh replied in the
affirmative. Protocol calls for children
to be sent home if they have a fever, undiagnosed rash, or other type of
communicable disease. This is why
accurate emergency cards are so important.
Rodney Barker asked if
they could provide some data on the number/percentage of students in the schools
taking psychotropic medicines.
Linda Walsh stated that
73% of the medications dispersed are identified as psychotropic and this does
not account for those who take it prior to coming to school. She will review the data and provide the specific
numbers at a later date.
Susie Heyman asked if
there is at least a health professional, if not a nurse, in each building.
Linda Walsh explained that
there are some elementary schools that work in a team structure, where the nurse
is in one building and the health assistant is in the other. While the health assistants are hard-working
employees, they are not certified nurses.
Eventually they would like to move these people to the secondary level,
to have them work with the nursing staff in those schools.
David Naparstek noted that
in addition to trying to attract certified nurses, another problem is the lack of substitutes when nurses are
absent.
Linda Walsh is concerned
about the nursing shortage looming on the horizon. There was a time when she had to turn away prospective employees
because of the sheer number applying.
As it stands, nurses must attain their Master’s Degree, which is both
costly and time-consuming and is resulting in fewer applicants statewide. Newton’s current salary structure is not as
good as some surrounding communities.
Hopefully, negotiations will address this issue. Field trip coverage is another area of
concern. If the building nurse
accompanies the students, that means the school is left unattended.
Superintendent Jeffrey
Young asked if they could comment on the adequacy of space of the health rooms.
Linda Walsh responded that
it has been an uphill battle to retain adequate space. However, once issues
have been identified, the system has been very responsive to their
requests. The problem lies more in needing
to be part of the planning process rather than reacting to situations. Their minimum requirements would be a
bathroom, sink, and window -- all necessary items because of air quality issues
and communicable diseases.
Jeff Young mentioned that
it will be important to include the Health Department in the initial planning
stages for all future building projects and renovations.
Verne Vance asked about
current involvement with health education activities.
Linda Walsh replied that
they do not have a master plan for working with the school system in this area,
and currently are only involved in programs at individual schools. Some of these include science projects on
bones and muscles, hand-washing and personal hygiene, and tobacco control
education. One of their goals is to
better utilize the nursing staff as a resource in the classroom. They do not want to interrupt teaching time,
rather to weave it into the curriculum that is being covered in the
classroom. They are also involved with
family health education, in terms of sending home information around head lice,
food allergies, and first aid. This
year they hope to also provide CPR training.
Verne Vance suggested they
develop a link with the school’s web site.
Jeff Young thanked the Health
Department staff for an excellent presentation and informative discussion. Their department has always made themselves
available to the schools in emergencies and for specific health related
issues. He looks forward to continuing
their collaboration, as they outline their plans for the future.
PRELIMINARY ENROLLMENT ANALYSIS REPORT
Sandra Guryan, Assistant
Superintendent for Business, Finance & Planning, presented the Preliminary
October 1 enrollment as 11,246 students.
While technically the numbers remain “flat,” they are down by two students
since last year and the first drop in an 11 year period. The report compares the projected
enrollments on a school-by-school and grade-by-grade basis.
Enrollment at the
elementary level dropped by 32 students more than anticipated and is made up of
a number of pluses and minuses at each school.
Of particular note is Countryside, where there were 39 fewer children than
projected. They have been reviewing
this data with the principal and found that over the summer 54 students moved
out of the district, while 15 moved in during that same timeframe. The reasons for the out-migration were
varied, so this appeared to be an anomaly.
At the middle schools,
projections called for a growth of 30 and the actual number was 32.
At the high schools, there
are eight more students than projected at Newton North, but 42 less than
anticipated at Newton South. In
reviewing this data, it was determined that the majority of the variance
occurred in grade nine. It appears that
a piece of this has to do with the out-of-district transfer process. In the past, they have been strict about
approving transfers from one high school to
the other on a one-for-one
swap basis. Earlier in the year, when
it was expected that North’s enrollment was to be flat and South was expected
to have many students beyond capacity, more transfers were allowed for South to
North. Another factor may have to do
with private school and other exit data that they are continuing to
review. Finally, last year they decided
to use the three vs. five-year historical trend in their analysis, believing it
would provide cleaner data
following the
reorganization of the middle schools.
In fact, if they had used the five-year trend, the projections would
have been more accurate. Next year they
will most likely include both for sake of comparison.
REPORT FROM USE OF SCHOOL BUILDINGS SUBCOMMITTEE
Nancy Levine reviewed the
highlights of the report and the recommendation of the subcommittee. She noted that they spoke with the various
user groups at the beginning of this process, reviewed former policies, talked
with staff about the permit and procedure processes, and had conversations with
the City’s Law Dept. The policy goals,
as set forth by the 1993 School Committee, were solid and they would like to
keep these intact. The 26% increase,
while appearing hefty, is a result of the fact that rates have not been increased
in seven years. Of the three options
presented in the material, the subcommittee Option #3, which changes the policy
only as it relates to businesses and non-Newton users and updates the fees for
all groups. There would be a rental fee
for these groups, in addition to the user fee, that would vary depending upon
the location. For example, it is less expensive to use a middle school vs. high
school auditorium. This may help reduce
demand for the two high school auditoriums, which are constantly in use. They
are recommending instituting the change in FY02, but bringing it before the
Committee at this time in order to provide user groups sufficient notice in
which to do their own budgeting.
Anne Borg added that other
school systems also charge rental fees for the use of their facilities.
Anne Larner commented that
care will be necessary in defining the groups.
When they refer to community groups receiving lower rates, they are
speaking of those that are primarily volunteer run. A clear and careful review of the application form and processes
will be conducted if the Committee accepts the subcommittee’s recommendation.
Rodney Barker expressed
concern about the Cub Scouts and City youth groups being charged the same rates
as municipal groups.
Nancy Levine explained
that Option #3 does not change the category for these groups, who already
receive a reduction in fees. It simply
increases the user fee rates at the same 26% rate that all groups will
realize.
Anne Borg explained that
the increase simply covers custodial costs.
Anne Larner noted that
there is no charge to the youth groups if they utilize the buildings prior to
6:00 p.m.
Any Vizulis asked about
the concept of piggybacking, where groups meeting simultaneously share the cost
of the fee.
Nancy Levine explained
that piggybacking was disallowed in 1994 and the subcommittee does not recommend
its reinstitution.
Susie Heyman commented
that no one likes to charge any group for the use of school buildings. However, when there are not enough funds for
programs and materials or enough money in the budget to properly maintain the
schools, it becomes necessary to ask people to bear the price of what it costs
to keep the schools opened and pay the custodians.
Nancy Levine noted that
part of the recommendation calls for annual reviews of the policy and fees so
that they can address any issues that may arise. This will also allow them to institute a formula-driven fee
structure that will allow them to adjust the fees each year based on the actual
costs.
Rodney Barker continues to
be troubled by the fact that youth groups are paying more than Recreation
Department programs.
Anne Borg reiterated that
the differential between the groups is the same as it has been in the
past. His proposal would be actually
lowering the rates for the youth groups.
Andy Vizulis asked about
groups being bumped last minute because of a school need.
Nancy Levine stated that
this has occurred mostly with Community Education and has been a problem that
needs to be addressed.
James Marini, Assistant
Superintendent for High Schools & Operations, explained that they have done
a lot of work to address this concern.
However, occasionally there are conflicts and if an emergency arises,
the understanding is that the schools have priority. The one area they need to make clear is that Community Education
is part of the school system and should be treated as such.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
DISCUSSION ON IMPACT OF SPECIAL EUCATION
LEGISLATION
Carol Daynard, Assistant
Superintendent for Pupil Services, updated the Committee on the latest legislation
with regard to special education. The
Department of Education identified two areas of non-compliance statewide – lack
of parental involvement and students being placed in more restrictive vs. least
restrictive environments. Fortunately,
Newton was not one of the communities cited for these non-compliance issues. The new Individual Evaluation Plan (IEP)
process has begun and they have sent letters to parents to help them understand
the changes, as well as copies of the parents rights brochure, which includes
new language.
She then talked about the
requirement that all special education students will participate in MCAS and
the discussions they have been having around developing a curriculum accommodation
plan. She envisions a framework similar
to the systemwide goals that will outline how they plan to address the needs of
children at risk of failure.
Another change in the
regulations has to do with the need to specifically identify a student’s
disability and the need for staff training in this area. In addition to the identification piece,
there is also specified regulatory language relating to the
process for each
disability. They are working on the
criteria and check sheets that will need to accompany these regulations.
Rodney Barker asked for a
definition of the 504 plan.
Carol Daynard replied that
Section 504 is part of the Civil Rights Act, which requires an accommodation
plan for a disability. Some examples
would be
providing students with
Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) extended time to take tests and allowing them
periodic breaks to move around the classroom.
There have also been changes to this law having to do with related
services and additional protections and due process rights for a child. One example of what is now considered a
related service provision is transportation, so she will be monitoring this
closely. Finally, she spoke about the
fact that the requirements for independent evaluations remain the same.
Susie Heyman asked if the
new IEP forms are computerized.
Carol Daynard explained
that the program arrived the second week of school and immediately
crashed. They have been doing them by
hand since. However, the Administrative
Technology Center (ATC) is in the process of helping them developing a template
for this purpose.
Susie Heyman is disturbed
that the legislative language from the State is geared more toward containing
costs than serving children. The public
policy committee of the Education Collaborative (EDCO) is developing some
recommendations around special education funding in order to lobby the
legislature.
DISCUSSION OF REDISTRICTING PROCESS
Jeff Young presented a
draft of the timeline for the redistricting process, including the development
of criteria on which to judge the final options. He envisions a parental survey, of which he also included a draft,
that will assist in developing the criteria from a citywide perspective. He also envisions at least two forums
involving the public in the discussions.
One would be a general conversation, with regard to what people believe
is important in a redistricting plan, and the other would be later in the
process, where they would comment on specific options that had been developed. He would also like to establish a community
advisory committee, which would involve members of the School Committee, school
administrative staff, city officials, principals, teachers, and parent
representatives. Their task would be to
review the enrollment projections and school capacities developed by staff, and
present several options for the School Committee to consider. In addition, they would work on a communication
plan for the schools and community at large.
He would like to consider some outside technical help as well, perhaps
in the data-gathering and
development stage of the operation. It is his goal to complete the process and
choose one option before the end of the school year. While this is going to be a difficult and emotional subject, with
goodwill, broad vision, cooperation, and communication, it can be done
successfully.
Susan Albright has some
concerns about the size of the advisory committee and its purpose.
Anne Larner is also concerned
about the size of the advisory committee and whether it can be effective. She thought the use of a facilitator would
be helpful. Her other concern has to do
with the balance of parental involvement, with 15 people representing the
elementary schools, four for the middle
schools, and only two for the high
schools. While she is optimistic that
they can select people that will look beyond their specific neighborhood to the
wider issues, it is more difficult for someone to look beyond their grade
level, not having had the experience of different levels. Finally, she mentioned the need to pay
critical attention to the interaction between program and how schools are
organized at the three levels, so that the ultimate product has a very
technical and professional standard and is something people can feel is
reliable.
Nancy Levine favors the
approach of bringing on board as many people as possible from the start, so as
not to end up with people reacting to plans, rather having a proactive
process.
Susie Heyman would like to
flush out the language in the redistricting survey and perhaps develop
different versions for the elementary and secondary levels.
Jeff Young reiterated that
this is only a draft and he would appreciate feedback from the Committee with
regard to revisions to the document.
Andy Vizulis hopes they
will not have to tie up all of the administrators’ time at each of the
meetings, rather bring them in for particular issues and discussions. From a parental viewpoint, a large group of
top administrators can be intimidating.
Anne Borg asked that they
consider the size of the schools when selecting principal representatives, so
that both small and large buildings are represented.
Anne Larner mentioned that
defining and agreeing on capacity is key to a good plan and will most likely
require a School Committee policy decision prior to the advisory committee
commencing with its work.
The School Committee
decided they needed further discussion around the makeup and charge of the
advisory committee and identifying their own criteria.
SCHOOL COMMITTEE CAUCUS
Verne Vance explained that
the purpose of the caucus is to elect the School Committee leadership for next
year.
MOTION: It was moved to nominate Verne Vance as
Chairperson of the Newton School
Committee
for 2001.
(Barker
- Larner)
Discussion:
Rodney Barker commented on
Mr. Vance’s leadership. He is
articulate, well-organized, and fair in his treatment of all Committee
members. Most importantly, he has a
sense of humor that has often lightened tense moments during discussions.
Anne Larner seconded Mr.
Barker’s comments and noted that they should stay with a winning team.
As there were no further
nominations for Chairperson...
MOTION: It was moved to close nominates for
Chairperson
of the School Committee for 2001.
(Barker
- Borg)
8 – 0 – 1
Absent:
Mayor Cohen
Vote on motion to nominate
Verne Vance as Chairperson:
8 – 0 – 1
Absent: Mayor Cohen
MOTION: It was
moved to nominate Anne Borg as
Vice-Chairperson of the Newton
School
Committee for 2001.
(Albright
- Barker)
Discussion:
Susan Albright commented
on Ms. Borg’s quiet competence and creative thinking. She is certain she will continue do an excellent job as
Vice-Chairperson of the Committee.
Rodney Barker mentioned
Ms. Borg’s incredible hard work as chairperson of the negotiation team.
Verne Vance stated that he
looks forward to having Ms. Borg serve as his Vice-Chairperson for another
year. She is primarily responsible for
the movement through the negotiations, with a spirit of cooperation on both
sides. He looks forward to continuing
to work with her and the rest of the Committee members on all the things they
have ahead to accomplish.
As there were no further
nomination for Vice-Chairperson...
MOTION: It was moved to close nominations for
Vice-Chairperson of the Newton
School
Committee for 2001.
(Levine
- Barker)
8 – 0 – 1
Absent: Mayor Cohen
Vote on motion to nominate
Anne Borg as Vice-Chairperson:
8 – 0 – 1
Absent: Mayor Cohen
MOTION: It
was moved to nominate Janet Goldrick, as
Executive Secretary to the Newton
School
Committee, through June 30, 2001.
(Borg
– Albright)
8 – 0 – 1
Absent: Mayor Cohen
ACTION ITEMS
VOTE TO ACCEPT DONATION
MOTION: It was moved to accept the donation of $500
cash
and $500 in merchandise from EDPRESS to the
Day Middle School.
(Larner
– Borg)
8 – 0 – 1
Absent:
Mayor Cohen
VOTE TO APPROVE BUDGET GUIDELINES
Susie Heyman would like to
change the word “academic” to “educational” in #1, as it is a more inclusive
term.
MOTION: It was moved to adopt the FY02 budget
guidelines, as
amended.
(Borg
– Larner)
8 – 0 – 1
Absent:
Mayor Cohen
COMMUNICATIONS
Janet Linder, 348 Central
St., Auburndale, suggested the Committee add more public hearings onto the
proposed redistricting schedule and highly publicize the
meetings. She also hopes the Superintendent will play
an active role in developing and proposing the options.
Deena David, 60 Rokebee
Rd., Waban, talked about the lack of discussions around cultural and
socio-economic differences in the City in past redistricting situations. It is an underlying and real issue that
exists and adds to the intensity of the debates, but is rarely mentioned. She hopes they are able to have open and
honest discussions about perceived vs. actual problems in this regard and unify
the City. Perhaps the facilitator could
be helpful in this regard.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned
at 10:40 p.m.