NEWTON SCHOOL
COMMITTEE
MINUTES
OF REGULAR MEETING – SEPTEMBER 25, 2000
EDUCATION
CENTER, FRAZIER ROOM, 7:30 P.M.
PRESENT: Chairperson
Verne Vance, Vice-Chairperson Anne Borg, Susan Albright, Rodney Barker, Susan
Heyman, Anne Larner, Nancy Levine, Andris Vizulis, Mayor David Cohen, James
Tierney, student representative – Newton North High School, Solomon Israel,
student representative – Newton South High School
OPEN SESSION
At 6:30 p.m., it was
announced that the Committee would entertain a motion to convene in executive
session.
MOTION: It was
moved, by roll call vote, to convene in executive session for the purpose of
conducting strategy sessions
in
preparation for negotiations with nonunion personnel
and
to discuss matters related to collective bargaining. If passed, the Committee will reconvene in open session at
7:30
p.m.
(Vizulis
- Levine)
8 – 0 – 1
Absent for vote: Mayor Cohen
ROLL CALL VOTE BY WARD:
Ward I, “yes” (Vizulis);
Ward II, "yes" (Albright); Ward III, "yes" (Larner); Ward
IV, "yes", (Levine); Ward V, "yes" (Heyman); Ward VI, “yes”
(Barker); Ward VII, "yes" (Vance); Ward VIII, “yes”, (Borg); Mayor
David Cohen, absent for vote
CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Verne Vance
called the meeting to order at 7:40 p.m.
Mayor Cohen reported on a
legal opinion rendered by the City Solicitor regarding the Open Meeting
Law. A question arose regarding the use
of a public building by the Parent Teacher Organization (PTO) Council. The City Solicitor has ruled, and the Office
of Campaign Finance agrees, that the PTO Council’s use of the building is
permissible, as long as buildings are made available to private groups
on an equal basis. The Use of School Building policy is applied
equally to all groups. The second
question had to do with political fundraising on school property. The statute states that fundraising is not
allowed in a municipal building and there is no allegation or indication that
this occurred at the 9/18/00 meeting in question. With regard to fundraising on public grounds vs. in the actual
buildings, the City Solicitor has indicated that this is not prohibited. While this allegation has not been
substantiated or verified, this would not be a violation of the law.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION
Adam Maleson, 336A
Lexington St., Auburndale, spoke of the character and integrity of elected
officials.
STUDENT REPRESENTATIVES’ DISCUSSSION
Verne Vance welcomed James
Tierney, student representative from Newton North, who was not present for
introductions at the last meeting.
RECOGNITIONS
The following recognitions
were acknowledged:
Penny Benjamin,
3rd grade teacher, Cabot Elementary School, for
being chosen as one of 33 teachers, of the 70,000
nominated, to
be honored in Disney’s American Teacher Awards.
The Automotive Technology
Program and the Auto Body & Collision Repair Program, for receiving national program
certification
status from the National Automotive Technicians
Education
Foundation, Inc.
National Merit
Scholarship semi-finalists:
Newton North Newton South
Jeffrey Arbeit Ilya Abyzov
Benjamin Elias David Durschlag
Arianna Kelly Sarah
Fine
Dror Ladin Carl
Gold
Andrea Letvin Timmy
Ho
Sarah Lewis Emily
Honig
Jamay Liu Katherine
Murphy
Michael Lu Tam
Ngo
Elizabeth Magruder Rui
Nie
Douglas Norton Vivek Rao
Lindsey Palmer Alissa Rothchild
David Ritt
Joel Rosen
Eliza Rosenbaum
Leela Sarathy
Benjaminn Wiegner
APPROVAL OF SCHOOL COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES
Discussion was held about
the new truncated format of the minutes and the desire to provide some more
detail, but not the extent of past practice.
A correction was noted to
the executive session minutes: Andy Vizulis was present and Rodney Barker was
absent.
MOTION: It was
moved to approve the School Committee
regular
and executive session meeting minutes
of 9/11/00, as amended.
(Levine
– Albright)
unanimous
SUPERINTENDENT’S PERSONNEL REPORT
Roberta “Bobbie” Dollase,
Director of Human Resources, updated the Committee on staffing. They still have some openings for aide and
Instructional Support Staff (ISS) positions.
Andy Vizulis asked if
there has been much response to the Human Resources’ web page.
Bobbie Dollase stated that
there has been some activity as a result of the web page. In next year’s recruiting efforts, they also
will be exploring other avenues on the Internet where they can post
listings. For example, Education Week is offering six months
free posting on their new web site after the first of the year.
SUPPORT SERVICES STATUS REPORT
Michael Pierce, Manager of
Support Services, thanked everyone who was involved in getting the summer
projects completed in a timely manner.
He also noted that the Angier Elementary School roof was completed.
Rodney Barker asked about
the Newton South High School science labs, Bigelow Middle School steps, and
custodial overtime.
Michael Pierce responded
that the outstanding items in the science labs have been brought to the
attention of the Building Department and they are still attempting to resolve
these issues. In terms of the Bigelow
steps, the item is on the Capital Improvement Plan list and is an extensive and
costly project. Finally, with regard to
custodial overtime, a great deal of that cost had to do with the cleaning of
Bowen and Carr. He will attempt to
recoup some of that cost through the Building Department.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
UPDATE ON STATUS OF HIGH SCHOOL TEXTBOOKS &
MATERIALS
James Marini, Assistant
Superintendent for High Schools & Operations, Sandy Guryan, Assistant
Superintendent for Business, Finance & Planning, and Carolyn Wyatt,
Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum & Instruction, presented the
report, which attempts to compare Newton’s spending in this area with seven
other similar communities. The research
indicates that Newton is spending considerably less in this area. The second part of the report deals with the
several year plan of additional expenditures to address this issue and how that
money was spent. The third piece is an
inventory of classroom materials. The
final section deals with curriculum cycles and associated appropriations.
Anne Larner commented that
in reviewing the FY98 Department of Education’s per pupil expenditure figures
for these communities, Newton is second in spending. This indicates that Newton has made some different choices in
terms of allocating funds rather spending less money.
Sandy Guryan agreed that
they spend as much, if not more, than other districts per pupil. However, the largest portion is spent on
staff, which impacts class size, program, and teacher load. What is left over is a minimal amount and
they are only spending approximately 1 and 1/2 – 2% of the budget on
instructional materials.
Susie Heyman commented
that the per pupil expenditure allocation may have worked in past, but does not
seem to make sense anymore.
Sandy Guryan responded that the concept can work but the level of allocation
for what they are expecting principals to do with it is simply too low. In another mid-sized district in which she was
employed, the budget was driven more by program. Instruction monies were given to coordinators and department
heads, who then funneled it back into the buildings. There is no right or wrong way and each method has pros and
cons.
Superintendent Jeff Young
noted that the way Newton now addresses the issue is through school-based
management, but without sufficient tools.
The alternative would be to funnel funds through programs and let
coordinators and department heads work with staff on spending. However, this can produce “turf wars” and pulls
power away from principals in running their buildings. Both methods have difficult trade-offs.
Carolyn Wyatt mentioned
that the curriculum revision cycles tie into the funding as well, because in
years when they are earmarking a specific curriculum area, an infusion of funds
is provided for that subject.
Susie Heyman believes they
need to work on a plan that deals with both building-based management and
program needs because they are not exclusive of one another. Recreating the textbook supplement as part
of the regular budget may be one option, as well as pulling out equipment
maintenance and other items from the per pupil allocation.
Discussion was had around
the issue of the prices of textbooks, particularly at the high school level,
and the cost for disposable materials in the earlier grades, as well as the
fact that costs increase much quicker than the inflation factor.
Jennifer Huntington,
Principal of Newton North High School, Thomas Gwinn, Science Department Chair
at Newton North High School, Jim McLaren, Science Department Chair at Newton South
High School, and Brenda Keegan, English Department Chair at Newton North High
School, talked about how the insufficient amount of money impacts their schools
and programs. Funding is not adequate
for textbooks, consumables, or lab materials, and the allocation has to also
cover items such as postage, paper, maintenance of copiers, etc. Outdated textbooks have to be supplemented
with current newspapers and magazines for information on the latest advancements
in a subject. It is a constant battle
of replacement of materials and often the only way they are ever able to
purchase new and different materials is through grant funding. Also, purchasing the cheapest edition of
paperbacks can mean eliminating the richer language of the fuller version,
which does have an impact on the program.
Jeff Young talked about
the fact that there is no great constituency for materials, so that when budget
cuts are forced it is often these areas that suffer at the expense of
staffing.
Anne Larner added that it
is easier to cut an elusive per pupil expenditure rather than a specific
program. The Committee will need to
discuss this in context with their budget guidelines.
Rodney Barker expressed
confusion about the comment regarding the majority of the money being spent on
staffing patterns. He cannot believe
that Newton’s staffing patterns are that much better than the comparable
communities in the report. He hopes
they can do some further research.
Susie Heyman noted that
often decisions are made in isolation and they do not have the full understanding
of the tradeoffs. The Committee has
made positive strides in class size and other areas, but may need to make some
adjustments now that they have a clearer picture.
DISCUSSION OF FUNDING FOR EDUCATION REFORM
Jeff Young provided an
overview of the draft position paper from the Association of School
Superintendents on Massachusetts School Finance. He mentioned that Massachusetts is ranked 44th out of
50 states for state financial support for education, while personal income is
ranked 4th in the nation. While
Ed Reform has improved the playing field and helped some less affluent
communities, clearly Newton has not made the kind of gains that they would
like. They stand significantly above
the foundation budget and, as a result, only 1/8 of their budget is funded by
the State.
Sandy Guryan talked about
how the formula provides resources to the most needy districts, which was the initial purpose of Ed Reform. The per pupil increase from the State has been
helpful to Newton, but predictability and timeliness in funding from the State
would be very beneficial in allowing them to analyze revenues and forecast
resources.
Jeff Young added that the
theory of Ed Reform was that communities like Newton would be able to utilize
the annual per pupil increment to implement Time and Learning mandates and
education reform efforts, but in reality the funding only serves to stabilize
costs.
Verne Vance mentioned that
school expenses are paid for by
property taxes, which are held in check by Proposition 2 1/2. Therefore, they do not have the ability to
access the wealth available in the community to support the schools.
Susie Heyman mentioned
that additional funding for areas in special education (SPED), as outlined in
the report, would be key areas in which Newton could advocate. Each community is struggling and fighting
for similar things and
tradeoffs are being made. Funding must be maintained for the less
economically powerful communities, while increasing the size of the overall
pie.
Anne Larner expressed
concern about some of the items listed in the report, such as full-day
kindergarten, lowering class size, expanding early education, etc. Minimum aid communities like Newton would not receive
any assistance to deal with these increasing mandates, because it would be
channeled through the foundation budget.
This sets increased expectations without sufficient resources.
APPOINTMENT OF BUDGET GUIDELINES SUBCOMMITTEE &
INITIAL DISCUSSION OF FY02 BUDGET GUIDELINES
Rodney Barker, Susan
Heyman and Nancy Levine will serve on the Budget Guidelines Subcommittee.
Jeff Young stated that the
administration is researching past budgets to determine the areas that have
been continually responsible for producing deficits,
in the hopes that they can
be funded at more appropriate levels.
Initial discussion was had
around some possible topics for the budget guidelines. The high school textbooks and materials were
mentioned, as was consumables at the lower grades. A request was made for research on comparable communities around
funding for the performing arts, as well as an appeal for a reserve contingency
for unexpected costs that arise during the year.
ACTION ITEMS
APPROVAL OF 2000-2001 PROPOSED SCHOOL COMMITTEE
DOCKET ITEMS
Discussion occurred around
the various meetings where the Committee would discuss a class size policy. It was determined not to set a specific date
for a vote on this topic until they see where these discussions lead and so that
they can receive sufficient input from the community. It was then decided to change the date for the final vote on the
budget guidelines, in order to include any policy issues that might arise out
of the class size discussions. A
timeframe for discussions around the issue of redistricting, while not
specifically appearing on the calendar, will be forthcoming.
MOTION: It was moved to approve the 2000-2001
Proposed
School
Committee Docket Items, as amended.
(Larner
– Borg)
8 – 0 – 1
Absent
for vote: Mayor Cohen
VOTE ON 2000-2001 SYSTEMWIDE GOALS
Some minor changes were
made to the wording of the systemwide goals.
The last sentence in the first paragraph reads...”The standards-based
curriculum we advocate balances the ideal of individual, professional
decision-making by classroom teachers, with agreements among teachers about the
sequencing and coherence of subject matter.”
The first sentence in the second paragraph of the Respect for Human
Differences Mission Statement reads...”to encourage the broadest understanding
and acceptance of human differences (including differences in socio-economic
class, gender, race, ethnicity, culture, language, learning styles, special
needs, physical appearance, sexual orientation, etc.) while affirming
fundamental similarities of the human community.”
MOTION: It was moved to approve the 2000-2001
Systemwide
Goals, as amended.
(Larner
– Heyman)
8
– 0 – 1
Absent for vote: Mayor Cohen
VOTE TO APPOINT A DELEGATE & ALTERNATE FOR
MASC/MASS CONFERENCE
MOTION: It was moved to appoint Rodney Barker, as
delegate, and Nancy Levine, as
alternate, to
the
Massachusetts Association of School
Committees/Massachusetts
Association of
School
Superintendents (MASC/MASS)
annual conference.
(Heyman
– Borg)
8
– 0 – 1
Absent
for vote: Mayor Cohen
VOTE TO ACCEPT GRANTS
MOTION: It was
moved to accept the new grants
totaling
$4,319,923, as outlined in
(Attachment
G).
(Larner –
Vizulis)
8 – 0 – 1
Absent for vote: Mayor Cohen
VOTE TO APPROVE DONATIONS
MOTION: It was moved to accept the donation of a
camera and equipment for Newton North
High
School’s sports broadcasting program.
(Larner –
Heyman)
8 – 0 – 1
Absent for vote: Mayor Cohen
REAPPOINTMENT TO NEWTON COMMUNITY EDUCATION
COMMISSION
MOTION: It was moved to reappoint Linda Casey as
a
representative to the Newton Community
Education Commission (July 1, 2000 –
June 30, 2002).
(Albright – Borg)
8 – 0 – 1
Absent
for vote: Mayor Cohen
COMMUNICATIONS
Andy Vizulis announced
that the Newton Public Schools now has an official web site and that people can
access it through www.newtonpublicschools.com. This is
a work in progress, but
there is a sufficient enough framework that documents can now be incorporated
and with little oversight from a webmaster.
This work was done without any financial support from taxpayers.
PUBLIC COMMENT
There were no members of
the public who wished to address the Committee at this time.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned
at 10:07 p.m.