DRAFT – 12.9.03
Design Review Committee
City of Newton, MA
Comments on Option E and
Revised New School Option, dated 12.8.03
Newton North High School
Feasibility Study
Updated schemes presented by DRA Architects 12/9/03
The following summary
outlines the collective comments of the Design Review Committee after consideration
of Options E and the New School Option as presented to the committee on 12/9/03
by DRA Architects and Turner Construction. This summary is a continuation of
the 11/9/03 design review factors and options summary prepared by the DRC on
the Feasibility Study material available at that time.
The Design Review
Committee was very pleased with the revisions presented by the DRA/Turner team.
Both the new hybrid option E and the revised new school option illustrate major
improvements in resolving issues raised about constructability, building image,
neighborhood interface, parking, service and other important design criteria.
Either solution would provide the city with a fundamentally new Newton North
High School building, understanding that the implementation and cost impacts of
the solutions differ. The Design Review Committee feels that either conceptual
solution would provide a high school solution that would serve the community
well for decades to come.
|
Option E |
|||
|
Area |
· 260K sf addition + 179K sf renovation |
|
|
|
Cost |
· $94.8M const. incl. all field and site work |
|
|
|
Risks/ Potential Deal
Breakers |
· Interface of old and new construction more of a challenge
than new construction |
||
|
|
|||
|
Considerations |
Characteristics |
Pros |
Cons |
|
|
|||
|
NNHS front door |
· Along Lowell Ave. adjacent to auditorium entrance |
· Prominent Lowell St. entry image ·
Separate from service · Good access to public functions |
|
|
Building Image |
·
New
Lowell Ave. façade · New CR wings wrap eastern façade of existing building ·
Need
good secondary access to athletic spaces for public and evening uses |
· Good options for Lowell Ave. façade · Good options for East façade · Best hybrid potential for unified new building image |
· Classroom addition configuration much improved along Elm
St. edge |
|
Future Site Development
Options |
· Most-compact hybrid plan, develops western half of site |
· More than half of site fully undeveloped by structures |
· Future development likely to extend from one of four
classroom wings |
|
Quality
of Outdoor Spaces |
· No unresolved spaces between new and old construction ·
Elm
Street parking lot intact and remains as buffer to neighborhood |
· Good options for Lowell Ave. space · Good spaces between classroom wings · Courtyard space in good location, geometry works well
with plan concept |
|
|
Athletic
Fields/Courts |
· New track and field complex · Loss of practice field · Loss of 6 tennis courts |
· New track and field complex |
· Loss of practice field · Loss of 6 tennis courts |
|
Service Access/Parking |
· New addition to be serviced from existing service area at
Lowell |
· Consolidates service · Increases parking by 100+ spaces · Elm Street parking to be coordinated, not to cause thru
traffic flow |
· Front door of school fronted by major parking lot · Service along front entry facade |
|
Interface of existing
and new construction, Town Center and Main Street |
· New horizontal Main Street · Connections minimized and simplified · Design opportunity equal to new option |
· Good Main Street and Town Center potential · Good connection of classroom wings to common functions |
|
|
Natural Light /
Environmental |
· Good natural light to CRs and common areas · Compact plan minimizes envelope area |
· Good natural light to CRs and common areas · Min. amount of new envelope area |
· Min. heat loss/gain with new envelope area |
|
Plan flexibility |
· Classroom wings could be planned as houses or pods |
· Classroom wings could be planned as houses or pods · Classrooms near common and support functions |
|
|
Constructability/Phasing
|
· Classroom wing adjacent to exiting construction |
· Limited loss of use of site during construction |
· Some disruption - this hybrid option offers best
protection against disruption during construction |
|
New High School – 12.
8. 03 Scheme |
|||
|
Area |
· 445K sf new const. |
|
|
|
Cost |
· $108.3M const. incl. all field and site work |
|
|
|
Risks/ Potential Deal
Breakers |
· Greatest cost |
||
|
|
|||
|
Considerations |
Characteristics |
Pros |
Cons |
|
|
|||
|
NNHS front door |
· Corner of Walnut and Elm |
·
Good
visibility ·
Free
of parking ·
Walnut
Street has civic functions already with Library, City Hall · Scale more compatible with street |
· New neighborhood element |
|
Building Image |
· All new |
· All new |
|
|
Future Site Development
Options |
· Compact plan ·
Flips
green space to Lowell Ave |
· Most of site undeveloped with buildings |
|
|
Quality
of Outdoor Spaces |
·
Good
pedestrian plaza along Walnut St. ·
Good
connections to Newtonville ·
Good
open field spaces ·
Buffered
parking |
·
Good
pedestrian plaza along Walnut St. ·
Good
connections to Newtonville ·
Good
open field spaces · Buffered parking |
|
|
Athletic
Fields/Courts | |||