DRAFT – 11.9.03
Design Review Committee
City of Newton, MA
Comments on Newton North High School Feasibility Study
Study
draft dated 9/17/03 with updates, presented by DRA Architects 11/04/03
The following summary outlines the collective comments of
the Design Review Committee after consideration of the feasibility study,
updates and discussion about the alternatives. The summary consists of two
basic parts. The first part reviews factors of land planning and facilities
development/renovation that were important in our discussions of all of the
concepts. The second part highlights particular characteristics of the
alternatives and lists pros and cons of each.
The factors listed below were developed understanding that
an extensive list of considerations has been developed by the School Committee.
This list is intended to supplement those factors and is focused on the
planning, design and construction aspects of the alternatives.
Key Land Planning and Facilities
Development/Renovation Factors
NNHS front door
A new front door to
NNHS is an important outcome of this project. Location of the front door
relative to neighbors, community use, “Main Street” and building service
functions are considerations.
Building Image
The construction of a
single new facility, or the combination of an addition and existing construction
provides a great opportunity for a new image for NNHS. The massing, plan
configuration and exterior envelope design approach will be key
in the appeal of the overall building development. The concepts should be
reviewed with an eye toward the construction and reconstruction of the school
project as a cohesive whole when complete.
In each of the renovation options a significant portion of
the existing building will be demolished along the Lowell Street façade. There
is a tremendous opportunity to change and improve the
overall image of NNHS with this project. A new entry, renovated and new
building facades, and windows into programs and
activity spaces will all add new life to the facility with any of the renovation
options. Likewise, the landscape along this street will change with major
opportunities for planting, circulation, seating and parking.
Future Site
Development Options
It is important to
consider maximizing long-term development options for the site. Large parcels
of city owned land are rare now, and as the city grows denser, the necessity
for preserving future land development options becomes even greater. Some
proposals spread out over more of the site than others and thereby impact
future options in different ways.
Quality of
Outdoor Spaces
The analysis of a
building-planning concept is sometimes overly focused on the building layout
and may not adequately consider the “left over” spaces that a particular scheme
causes. The addition options and the new construction alternatives have very
different resultant outdoor spaces, the qualities of which are important to
consider.
Design Review Committee
Comments on Newton North High School Feasibility Study
Athletic
Fields/Courts
Athletic fields to
support the academic programs were reviewed. The options studied have a variety
of impacts on current athletic fields – options include no change, loss,
relocation, and/or reconfiguration of fields and courts.
Service
Access/Parking
Currently the major
service access for the high school is on Lowell Street. In renovation scenarios
it is considered too difficult and expensive to move due to its location
central to major building functions such as the cafeteria and kitchen, which
will remain in place. All renovation schemes plan for the mechanical,
electrical and plumbing systems in the vicinity of the current loading dock to
remain in place. Additionally, the adjacent streets, Hull and Elm, were deemed
too small to consider for the significant traffic and truck sizes required for
this purpose.
The impact on parking
varies among alternatives; in no case are numbers of spaces reduced. In some
cases parking lots are replaced with an addition and in all the
renovation/addition options new spaces are developed on the Lowell Avenue edge.
Interface of
existing and new construction, Town Center and Main Street
In the
renovation/addition scenarios much of the existing building area is comprised
of common support spaces such as dining, library, theatre and the pool. These
are spaces used by all students on a regular basis – these could be considered
“Town Center” functions. How and where a
proposed new building addition meets the existing building was discussed. The
connection of these is key to the organization of the
plan, flow of students and staff, and the creation of a meaningful Town Center
and how that connects to Main Street or other major circulation spline.
The demarcation lines
between existing construction and new construction are key junctures in
construction. The size, location and configuration of these meeting points can
result in quite different construction solutions. In order to maximize building
longevity and durability these junctures need to be carefully detailed and
constructed in future phases of the project.
Natural Light/
Environmental
Options were reviewed
for availability of natural light and ventilation to classrooms, workspaces and
support spaces. Environmental considerations such as amount of building
envelope were discussed – conditioning and heat loss issues increase with
increased envelope area.
Plan
flexibility
The ability of an
option to accommodate varying internal planning structures is important. The
alternatives were considered for their ability to suit “houses” or “pods”, and
for their potential to accommodate small and large meeting, learning and
working spaces. The detailed planning of various layouts is a task appropriate
for study after a concept has been selected – the goal at this point is to identify
any scheme that might prevent future planning flexibility.
Design Review Committee
Comments on Newton North High School Feasibility Study
Constructability/Phasing
Phasing and
constructability were briefly reviewed. All schemes at this point are estimated
to take 55 months to complete. In all options the new construction component is
completed first, creating swing space for classrooms, followed by major
demolition. Construction mitigation planning will be important to minimize the
impact to the NNHS population, neighbors and the community.
Issues
for Further Study
Several topics were discussed that will require further
study as the alternative studies are concluded and an alternative is developed.
Among the topics for further study are:
·
Underground utilities and subsoil conditions relative to
planning concepts
·
Structural systems – compatibility of existing and planned
·
Soils and subsurface conditions for additions, site
drainage
·
MEP system alternatives, equipment locations, alternative
energy options
|
Option A/B/C1 |
|||
|
Area |
· 185K sf addition + 258K sf renovation |
|
|
|
Cost |
· $84.7M const. · $400K stadium demo. · $1M bleachers · $650K synthetic track and field |
|
|
|
Risks/ Potential Deal
Breakers |
· Construction proximity to Elm Street · Potential for awkward assembly of new and old
construction |
||
|
|
|||
|
Considerations |
Characteristics |
Pros |
Cons |
|
|
|||
|
NNHS front door |
· Planned at existing location ·
Location
is major juncture of new and old construction at north side of site |
· In close proximity to community activities, theatre · Near important building juncture · Could easily be oriented to
Lowell St. |
· Too close to Elm Street · Near important building juncture |
|
Building Image |
· New Lowell Ave. façade, central wing flanked by 2 wings –
athletic and classroom |
· Good options for Lowell Ave. facade |
· Awkward classroom addition configuration |
|
Future Site Development
Options |
· Semi-compact plan, develops western half of site |
· Half of site fully undeveloped by structures |
· Addition could be more compact |
|
Quality
of Outdoor Spaces |
· Unresolved spaces between new and old construction ·
Elm
Street parking lot developed as classroom wing |
· Good options for Lowell Ave. space · Spaces between new and old wings partially protected from
elements |
· Awkward spaces between new and old wings · Face of CR wing along Elm St. without any buffer · New wing juts into athletic areas |
|
Athletic
Fields/Courts |
· Loss of soccer field |
· All other fields and courts as-is |
· Loss of soccer field |
|
Service Access/Parking |
· New wing to be serviced from Elm · Parking at Elm now at Lowell · |
· Reduces parking and traffic along Elm |
· Service access logistics to new addition uncertain |
|
Interface of existing
and new construction, Town Center and Main Street |
· New wing attached at single, narrow point · Vertical Main Street |
· Meeting point of old and new near theatre entry |
· Limited options for old / new connections · Vertical Main Street least desirable · Town Center functions disconnected from Main Street |
|
Natural Light /
Environmental |
· Maximum natural light to CRs and common areas ·
New
CR wing all new envelope area |
· Maximum natural light to CRs and common areas · Med. level new envelope area |
· Med. heat loss/gain with new envelope area |
|
Plan flexibility |
· Classroom wings could be planned as houses or pods |
· Classroom wings could be planned as houses or pods |
· Classrooms not near common and support functions |
|
Constructability/Phasing
|
· Classroom wing construction stand alone |
· |
· |
|
Option C2 |
|||
|
Area: |
· 225K sf addition + 179K sf renovation |
|
|
|
|
· $92.5M const. · stadium demo incl. · bleachers incl. · $650K for synthetic track and field |
|
|
|
Risks/ Potential Deal
Breakers |
· Most interface of new and old construction · | ||